Cotton blocks federal shield law for journalists
Source: The Hill
12/10/24 7:14 PM ET
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) blocked a federal shield law that would protect journalists from revealing their sources and material to the government. In the Senate on Tuesday, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) asked for unanimous consent for the Senate to pass the Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act, known as the PRESS Act, and Cotton objected.
Cotton criticized the “liberal media” and said it doesn’t “deserve more protections.” “The press badge doesn’t make you better than the rest of America or put you above the law,” he said on the Senate floor.
The Hill has reached out to Cotton’s office for comment, but in a post on the social platform X, he said the bill would “undermine” national security and “turn liberal reporters into a protected class.” “No American citizen should be afforded the privilege provided in this bill, least of all the media,” Cotton said in the post.
Last month, President-elect Trump urged Republicans to “KILL THIS BILL,” despite it passing the House with bipartisan support. Wyden, who wrote the Senate version of the bill, was looking to pass the legislation without a roll call, but Cotton objected.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5033592-cotton-blocks-federal-shield-law-journalists/
What "blocked" means is that rather than a "unanimous consent" (to pass) and done, they have to go through the longer "regular process" of a cloture vote, debate, and then a final roll call vote.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f1b5/1f1b53f91e926ad0db7c9b92e8d3ffc04fd25ac1" alt=""
Old Crank
(5,291 posts)oasis
(51,971 posts)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e169/9e169a638c7d123f278a135485778405043cbf94" alt=""
OldBaldy1701E
(7,291 posts)Thence...
sinkingfeeling
(54,205 posts)orangecrush
(23,211 posts)You piece of shit.
PortTack
(35,302 posts)johnnyfins
(1,725 posts)Persons go to some secret dickhead/asshole school as part of their training? Sure seems like it...
Seinan Sensei
(859 posts)Cottonmouth says no anonymous sources
But then, you can have all the anonymous REsources (dark money) you want
Fuckstick weirdo
I say flip it around.
1) Keep journalistic resources anonymous
2) Name any and all contributions to politics and politicians
tonekat
(2,134 posts)Now, due to corporate ownership, our media sucks and caters to their owners, but Cotton is afraid of a Free Press as they'll let his constituents know what a jerk he is.
Ford_Prefect
(8,268 posts)He's a Republican senator from a southern state. Of course he has dirty secrets!