Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(10,834 posts)
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 05:29 PM Dec 27

Trump asks Supreme Court to pause law that could ban TikTok

Last edited Fri Dec 27, 2024, 06:05 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: MSNBC

Dec. 27, 2024, 2:09 PM PST / Updated Dec. 27, 2024, 2:23 PM PST
By Hayley Miller

President-elect Donald Trump on Friday urged the Supreme Court to pause a law that could ban TikTok nationwide on Jan. 19 if its Chinese owner doesn’t sell the popular social media app to an American company.

In a 25-page amicus brief filed with the court, Trump asked the justices to stay the Jan. 19 deadline — which is one day before Inauguration Day — so his administration could “pursue a negotiated resolution” that would “obviate the need” for the justices to rule on the case.

“President Trump alone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise, the electoral mandate, and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the Government — concerns which President Trump himself has acknowledged,” the brief stated.

TikTok and its parent company, China-based ByteDance, appealed to the Supreme Court last week after lower courts rejected its challenge to the law. The justices agreed to hear the challenge and set oral arguments in the case for Jan. 10.



Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/trump-tiktok-ban-supreme-court-rcna185605



Calling his SCOTUS buddies to come rescue him.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump asks Supreme Court to pause law that could ban TikTok (Original Post) ificandream Dec 27 OP
Hoping his check will clear before that date . . . . . . no_hypocrisy Dec 27 #1
I didn't know he was President yet... Bluethroughu Dec 27 #2
Same thought here. ificandream Dec 27 #4
As soon as the election was called, he instantly became the de-facto president in the media. PSPS Dec 27 #8
I don't know if my heart can handle 4 years of this. Bluethroughu Dec 27 #12
i wonder how much he got paid in his offshore account from China? kimbutgar Dec 27 #3
tRUMP should file a lawsuit or whatever everybody else does, to forestall implementation of a new law, via the SWBTATTReg Dec 27 #5
Well, he kind of did with the amicus brief he filed today. ificandream Dec 27 #6
Yes, I know, and one of my thoughts was that does he even have standing to do so? he seems like he goes SWBTATTReg Saturday #19
My guess is he's trying to help out multi billionaire Jeff Yass. Lucky Luciano Dec 27 #7
Does he even have standing? Or did they kick the can back from the future? GreenWave Dec 27 #9
He filed an amicus brief. Standing not an issue onenote Tuesday #21
If Trump is for Tik Tok, I'm in favor of banning it. MichMan Dec 27 #10
I rather enjoy Tiktok, and always thought the zeal to ban it was a rather straneg position to stake out Tarc Dec 27 #11
He's not the fucking president yet! Initech Dec 27 #13
"the consummate dealmaking expertise?" Grins Dec 27 #14
You beat me to it! The "Consummate dealmaking expertise" Ziggysmom Saturday #17
Helping his deep pocket contributor who is heavily invested in China owned Tik Tok. nt yaesu Dec 27 #15
They *should* reject it and make their ruling as he isn't the President and has no say so. cstanleytech Saturday #16
Bet he can count on one hand the number of times he "Consummated" with Mel ! Ziggysmom Saturday #18
'I don't know what this is': Prosecutor buries Trump's new 'Legally Blonde' court filing LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #20

Bluethroughu

(6,088 posts)
2. I didn't know he was President yet...
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 05:38 PM
Dec 27

I thought that starts 1/20... that's a lot of time before he is administered the oath.

PSPS

(14,207 posts)
8. As soon as the election was called, he instantly became the de-facto president in the media.
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 06:24 PM
Dec 27

It's been 24/7 trump everywhere again. Even his yet-to-be-confirmed cabinet clowns are already sending out "warning letters."

SWBTATTReg

(24,400 posts)
5. tRUMP should file a lawsuit or whatever everybody else does, to forestall implementation of a new law, via the
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 06:13 PM
Dec 27

regular process that already exists to address such issues via the regular court system. He's not special or have any special powers, at least yet.

SWBTATTReg

(24,400 posts)
19. Yes, I know, and one of my thoughts was that does he even have standing to do so? he seems like he goes
Sat Dec 28, 2024, 04:23 PM
Saturday

directly to the US Supreme Court every time he has anything. It's like his own personal court. That's really what I'm going after, that he doesn't have standing on literally anything or everything, at least not yet.

Lucky Luciano

(11,504 posts)
7. My guess is he's trying to help out multi billionaire Jeff Yass.
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 06:19 PM
Dec 27

Yass is a typical libertarian billionaire and founder of extremely successful Susquehanna Investment Group - a brilliant prop trading firm that was a pioneer in quantitative methods for trading…but Yass’s biggest boon came from being an early investor in ByteDance (TikTok) and this pushed his net worth to $44B.

Yass was a never trumper, but this cycle he grudgingly went with him and is prob part of the dark money. His lowness probably has to pay him back.


PS: Why the fuck would a President be making/pressuring the SCOTUS? That’s not how this is supposed to work. I know I know…just being rhetorical.

Tarc

(10,581 posts)
11. I rather enjoy Tiktok, and always thought the zeal to ban it was a rather straneg position to stake out
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 08:38 PM
Dec 27

Don't really care about Trump's position and bluster, but I'd rather see the app survive.

Grins

(7,954 posts)
14. "the consummate dealmaking expertise?"
Fri Dec 27, 2024, 10:24 PM
Dec 27
“President Trump alone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise…”

He does? Proof…?

Did he write that? Or was it one of his ball-washers trying to curry favor with the beast?

cstanleytech

(27,215 posts)
16. They *should* reject it and make their ruling as he isn't the President and has no say so.
Sat Dec 28, 2024, 04:02 AM
Saturday

Next year he will be but he isn't as of right now.

Ziggysmom

(3,661 posts)
18. Bet he can count on one hand the number of times he "Consummated" with Mel !
Sat Dec 28, 2024, 06:42 AM
Saturday

Bet she is SO happy having the orange mushroom consummate with her

LetMyPeopleVote

(155,858 posts)
20. 'I don't know what this is': Prosecutor buries Trump's new 'Legally Blonde' court filing
Tue Dec 31, 2024, 03:10 PM
Tuesday

This filing made no sense to me



https://www.rawstory.com/trump-tiktok-2670695256/

A baffled MSNBC host and an amused Florida prosecutor attempted to make sense of a brief submitted by Donald Trump's lawyers to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding a possible ban of the popular TikTok app.

With the court poised to rule on the ban, an attorney for the president-elect -submitted a brief on Friday asking the judges to hold off on hearing the case until the president-elect is sworn in so he can attempt to negotiate a compromise......

Speaking with State Attorney for Palm Beach County Dave Aronberg, MSNBC host Christina Ruffini professed, "Does the president even have standing to do this? And what kind of a motion is this? Is this an amicus brief, a writ? I don't know what this is. Can he just involve himself in a case that he is not, you know, a party to? "

The laughing Aronberg replied, "These are all great questions; I had the same questions, too, because normally, Supreme Court? You've got this very buttoned-up group of lawyers who argue specific legal issues, and here's Trump, coming in like a bull in a china shop."

"It's like the movie 'Legally Blonde' when he comes in and just starts spouting off, like 'I have a huge electoral mandate, I'm the smartest and the best, and I can negotiate, so just pause everything, let me step in and let me handle this!'" he joked.

"There's nothing in the law that says he can do that, but he's Donald Trump," the prosecutor explained. "He appointed three out of these nine justices, so he thinks he can do it. I don't know if the Supreme Court is going to go along with it, but it is really interesting that Trump, who often thinks he's above the law, is now doing something I've never seen before in front of the Supreme Court."


Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump asks Supreme Court ...