Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Chemical-Weapons Attack In Syria: Is There a Place for Skepticism?
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria-is-there-a-place-for-skepticism/
The Chemical-Weapons Attack In Syria: Is There a Place for Skepticism?
The American media has excluded dissenting expert opinions in its rush to embrace Trumps war on Syria.
By James Carden
APRIL 19, 2017
<snip>
The Nation spoke to Postol over the weekend.
What I think is now crystal clear, he said, is that the White House report was fabricated and it certainly did not follow the procedures it claimed to employ.
My best guess at the moment is that this was an extremely clumsy and ill-conceived attempt to cover up the fact that Trump attacked Syria without any intelligence evidence that Syria was in fact the perpetrator of the attack . It may be, he continued, that the White House staff was worried that this could eventually come outa reckless president acting without regard to the nations security, risking an inadvertent escalation and confrontation with Russia, and a breakdown in cooperation with Russia that would cripple our efforts to defeat the Islamic State.
If that is not an impeachable offense, Postol told The Nation, then I do not know what is.
<snip>
The Chemical-Weapons Attack In Syria: Is There a Place for Skepticism?
The American media has excluded dissenting expert opinions in its rush to embrace Trumps war on Syria.
By James Carden
APRIL 19, 2017
<snip>
The Nation spoke to Postol over the weekend.
What I think is now crystal clear, he said, is that the White House report was fabricated and it certainly did not follow the procedures it claimed to employ.
My best guess at the moment is that this was an extremely clumsy and ill-conceived attempt to cover up the fact that Trump attacked Syria without any intelligence evidence that Syria was in fact the perpetrator of the attack . It may be, he continued, that the White House staff was worried that this could eventually come outa reckless president acting without regard to the nations security, risking an inadvertent escalation and confrontation with Russia, and a breakdown in cooperation with Russia that would cripple our efforts to defeat the Islamic State.
If that is not an impeachable offense, Postol told The Nation, then I do not know what is.
<snip>
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Chemical-Weapons Attack In Syria: Is There a Place for Skepticism? (Original Post)
bananas
Apr 2017
OP
or government's bipartisan track record of manipulating intel in favor of military action means...
yurbud
Apr 2017
#1
Yes, and shame on anyone who automatically buys the official govt narrative
Fast Walker 52
Apr 2017
#4
yurbud
(39,405 posts)1. or government's bipartisan track record of manipulating intel in favor of military action means...
there is little reason to believe much more than that people might have died in Syria and chemical weapons might have been involved--and that more people in Syria will definitely die as a result of that story being told.
Blue_Tires
(56,735 posts)3. Since we're already there
what good does it do to manipulate intel now? It's not like we need a justification... And it's not like Trump is doing anything other than puffing himself up (you will note that there were other chemical attacks before this that Trump ignored)...
Blue_Tires
(56,735 posts)2. 75% of the time
Last edited Fri Apr 21, 2017, 05:29 PM - Edit history (1)
whenever there is a "question" headline, the answer is "NO"
Let's not distort the issue with truther nutbar speculation... Remember that's an old Russian trick...
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)4. Yes, and shame on anyone who automatically buys the official govt narrative
many smart people are very sketpical