You probably missed this Supreme Court decision. It will change how government works.
On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a seemingly innocuous case about fishing vessels that will reshape how our federal government balances power and is one of the most important steps in forcing Congress to become legislators again.
The new precedent set by the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision overturns one set by Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, a 1984 ruling that courts must defer to executive agencies interpretations of ambiguities in the law, so long as that interpretation is reasonable.
In this case, the National Marine Fisheries Service required a group of commercial fishermen to pay the wages of monitoring programs to ensure they were complying with conservation laws. The original statute did not specify that the wages must be paid by the government, so the government handed the fishermen an estimated cost of $710 per day. Friday's decision sends the fee issue back to the lower courts.
The precedent allowed executive agencies to wildly reinterpret laws in the case of any congressional ambiguity at the whim of whoever was in the White House.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/probably-missed-supreme-court-decision-090953848.html
CincyDem
(6,935 posts)walkingman
(8,347 posts)circuits in America.
5th (Alito) - Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi
11th (Thomas) - Florida, Georgia, Alabama
elleng
(136,090 posts)Silent Type
(6,681 posts)nice to have access to Court vs. an Administrative Law Judge worried about his job.
This kind of stuff works both ways
dpibel
(3,325 posts)You are a poster with whom I nearly always agree.
But this piece is from a writer who believes that overturning Chevron is a good thing.
And I'm not aware of anyone on this side of the political aisle who thinks Loper Bright is a good thing.
The whole idea of it, after all, is to paralyze the EPA and other agencies that bother the right.