Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(116,186 posts)
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 12:01 PM Jul 2024

Stephen King's Trump Supreme Court Comment Goes Viral

Stephen King has expressed concern after the Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump has "some immunity" from prosecution.

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have immunity for official acts conducted while in office, but not for unofficial acts. The ruling was related to the Department of Justice's election interference case, in which the 78-year-old is accused of attempting to overturn the 2020 general election. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and has repeatedly said the case is part of a political witch hunt aimed at derailing his presidential bid.

In response to the news, King took to X, formerly Twitter, to blast the decision.




"In the name of 'originalism,' Trump's Supreme Court has taken a wrecking ball to the Constitution," the horror author said in a post that has received more than 1.2 million views. Newsweek has emailed Trump's campaign team for comment.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/stephen-king-s-trump-supreme-court-comment-goes-viral/ar-BB1phUEg
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leftieNanner

(15,729 posts)
1. Steven King's twisted horror imagination
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 12:16 PM
Jul 2024

Probably couldn't have made up what is happening now.

Good for you, Steven!

sheshe2

(87,978 posts)
13. It's a must read.
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 03:01 PM
Jul 2024

I have read it several times and watched the TV adaption…never as good as the book but worth a watch.

0rganism

(24,732 posts)
15. At this point it seems more like The Langoliers
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 03:06 PM
Jul 2024

Huge sections of reality outright vanishing into the maws of uncaring "law-keepers". Wait, wasn't that activity regulated by the federal government? Not anymore! Wait, weren't we free to do this other thing without interference? Not anymore! Wait, isn't there an agency to handle my request? Guess what?

Entire chunks of constitutional reality, centuries of precedent, rewritten almost instantly to the ambient sound of "nom nom nom".

Dale in Laurel MD

(754 posts)
2. And, speaking of originalism,
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 12:18 PM
Jul 2024

they have turned the framers' intentions entirely on their head and ignored original intent.

Attilatheblond

(4,479 posts)
3. New inscription needed above the enterance to the SCOTUS building:
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 12:26 PM
Jul 2024

"God Save the King!" seems a more accurate statement for the actions of the Roberts Court of Jesters and psychophants.

Hermit-The-Prog

(36,611 posts)
6. I'm still trying to find that presidential immunity in the U.S. Constitution
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 02:02 PM
Jul 2024

Anybody happen to have a copy of Robber Baron Roberts' secret decoder ring?

Hermit-The-Prog

(36,611 posts)
8. Robber Baron Roberts, Clearance Thomas, Mockalito, Coathanger Barrett, Goreysucker, and
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 02:42 PM
Jul 2024

Beer Bong Weenie Waver must have secret decoder rings that let them read the hidden messages in the U.S. Constitution.

Either that, or they're just a Subversive Court trying to remake the U.S. to fit their dystopian, dysfunctional, hateful, autocratic, extremist vision.

Kalifornia9

(56 posts)
10. There assuredly cannot be any expectation
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 02:46 PM
Jul 2024

That this would be applied fairly. This would only allow the justices to move the goalpost of any damn thing no matter how deplorable into the "official duty" folder for their pet Trump, "unofficial" and disallowed for Biden or other Dem. Not fooled.
Just like McTurtule disallowed Obama's SC pick but same rule didn't apply after.

Ligyron

(7,904 posts)
14. They completely ignored the original document and it's wording.
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 03:03 PM
Jul 2024

Anyone with a 6th grade education can read the relevant phrases and there's nothing in the "original" about such powers, quite the opposite if anything.

They just made that shit up out of thin air.

They've also ignored all previous rulings, taken away women's hard earned reproductive rights, damn near eliminated the powers of regulatory agencies and criminalized poverty.

The only way to be rid of them is for them to either quit, which they won't, or they have to die.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Stephen King's Trump Supr...