Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Court Fools Itself - The Roberts Court has made the current crisis of American democracy perpetual.
The AtlanticThe Trumpist justices on the Supreme Court had a very serious problem: They needed to keep their guy out of prison for trying to overthrow the government. The right-wing justices had to do this while still attempting to maintain at least a pretense of having ruled on the basis of the law and the Constitution rather than mere partisan instincts.
So they settled on what they thought was a very clever solution: They would grant the presidency the near-unlimited immunity Donald Trump was asking for, while writing the decision so as to keep the power to decide which presidential acts would be official and immune to criminal prosecution, and which would be unofficial and therefore not. The president is immune, but only when the justices say he is. The president might seem like a king, but the justices can withhold the crown.
The right-wing justices, in rewriting of the Constitution in Trumps image, have clearly diverged from the intentions of the founders. In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton wrote that former presidents would be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. Expanding on his point, Hamilton wrote, The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. The Roberts Court turned the office of the presidency the Founders made into the kind of monarchical office they rebelled against.
The justices, less independent arbiters than the shock troops of the conservative movement, wanted Trump to be immune to prosecution, and so they conjured a rationale for doing so, with a narrow window of legal accountability that only they have the right to determine. But that window might as well be barred from the inside: What Jacksons story shows is that the feeble, arbitrary restraints the justices put into their own grant of royal immunity to Trump will not withstand any president with the capacity to violate them. Unfortunately, the day a rogue president shows the Supreme Court just how powerless it really is, it will not be the justices who suffer most for their folly.
So they settled on what they thought was a very clever solution: They would grant the presidency the near-unlimited immunity Donald Trump was asking for, while writing the decision so as to keep the power to decide which presidential acts would be official and immune to criminal prosecution, and which would be unofficial and therefore not. The president is immune, but only when the justices say he is. The president might seem like a king, but the justices can withhold the crown.
The right-wing justices, in rewriting of the Constitution in Trumps image, have clearly diverged from the intentions of the founders. In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton wrote that former presidents would be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. Expanding on his point, Hamilton wrote, The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. The Roberts Court turned the office of the presidency the Founders made into the kind of monarchical office they rebelled against.
The justices, less independent arbiters than the shock troops of the conservative movement, wanted Trump to be immune to prosecution, and so they conjured a rationale for doing so, with a narrow window of legal accountability that only they have the right to determine. But that window might as well be barred from the inside: What Jacksons story shows is that the feeble, arbitrary restraints the justices put into their own grant of royal immunity to Trump will not withstand any president with the capacity to violate them. Unfortunately, the day a rogue president shows the Supreme Court just how powerless it really is, it will not be the justices who suffer most for their folly.
Archive Link
https://web.archive.org/web/20240724112934/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/roberts-supreme-court-2024-term/678983/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 4042 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Court Fools Itself - The Roberts Court has made the current crisis of American democracy perpetual. (Original Post)
MayReasonRule
Jul 2024
OP
Best_man23
(5,124 posts)1. When VP Harris Wins, This Will Happen
Lindseed Graham or Turtle will go to the floor of the Senate and make a speech demanding a Constitutional amendment to curtail a president's "absolute immunity."
MayReasonRule
(1,832 posts)4. Genies Do Not Willingly Return To Their Bottle
That genie is already unleashed!
wolfie001
(3,676 posts)2. John Roberts is a spineless jackass
He's NO LEADER.
MayReasonRule
(1,832 posts)3. Roberts Is A Theocratic Fascist Jackass
The sitting majority of SCOTUS are each various flavors of theocratic fascists.
The sitting majority of SCOTUS are traitorous criminals.
The sitting majority of SCOTUS belongs in prison.
wolfie001
(3,676 posts)6. Yes! And his wife, just like Alito's and Thomas's are up to their necks in their own bullshit
Cheers
MayReasonRule
(1,832 posts)7. Indeed!!!
Fascists always are!
MayReasonRule
(1,832 posts)5. Nat-C Or Nazi No Matter The Name Their Evil Depravity's Always The Same
"Every thought and every idea, every doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose. And everything must be examined from this point of view and used or rejected according to its utility."
-- Mein Kampf, Vol. I, Chapter 8.
-- Mein Kampf, Vol. I, Chapter 8.
The Wizard
(12,871 posts)8. The Roberts Court
will have a perpetual dark cloud over it. There is no good ending when the highest Court perverts justice. Minority rule made possible by Mitch McConnell and his band of criminal Repubic senators.