I know what Trump was really talking about in his child care rant, and it's even scarier than you thought
An incoherent rant Donald Trump delivered at an appearance Thursday in answering a question about child care policy has gone viral, mostly because it reached new heights of incoherence, even for him.
But what commentators and viewers have missed is the tiny nugget of actual fact nestled within Trumps 374 words of absolute gibberish. Thats too bad, because that nugget makes his answer even dumber, and scarier, than you might have imagined.
Heres how he launched into the topic at the Economic Club of New York, when asked by attendee Reshma Saujani, a Democratic childrens advocate, if he would commit to making child care more affordable and what specific piece of legislation he would advance as president to do so:
Well, I would do that, and were sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Sen. Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so, uh, impactful on that issue. Its a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that Im talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care is. Couldnt, you know, theres something, you have to have it in this country you have to have it.
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-09-06/i-know-what-trump-was-really-talking-about-in-his-child-care-rant-and-its-even-dumber-than-you-thought
Summary: Rubio's and Ivanka's 12 week paid family leave plan would delay the worker's ability to receive Social Security benefits by twice that time. It would be a Republican stealth attack on Social Security.
werdna
(929 posts)The idea was to allow new parents, including adoptive parents, to receive up to 12 weeks of paid family leave. That sounds pretty good so far: The idea of paid family leave was (and is) enormously popular with voters, and providing it to American families would finally bring the U.S. into line with every other high-income nation in the world.
But in the proposal by Rubio and Ivanka Trump, families would have to raid their Social Security to pay for it by reducing or delaying their retirement benefits. As the Urban Institute calculated, for every 12-week leave, new parents would have to delay their Social Security benefits by more than twice that period, or as much as six months.
Parents who took four 12-week leaves, according to this analysis, would lose 10% of their retirement benefits, for life.
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-09-06/i-know-what-trump-was-really-talking-about-in-his-child-care-rant-and-its-even-dumber-than-you-thought
Lonestarblue
(11,827 posts)Plus, it does nothing for the costs of longer-term childcare for kids before they go to kindergarten and school. Trust Republicans to find a sneaky way to hurt the middle class and poor.
patphil
(6,951 posts)It's simply a scheme to allow you to take money from your Social Security account that is already yours, but wouldn't normally be accessible until you retire.
It's a sucker deal that reduces your ability to pay your bills late in life.
They're not giving you a thing.
Hekate
(94,665 posts)
. for whatever they come up with until it totally runs out of money .
Yep. And then when retirees cant go on any longer on their own they can move in on their adult children. JD Vance family values.
Sweetie, I know we said wed help you go to college, but grandma needs a hip replacement and grandpa cant remember which room is the bathroom.
When Ohio instituted it's income tax it was done for the sole purpose of funding education. Fast Forward and lo and behold it get's voted on to put it into the general fund. Rinse and repeat with the state lottery and now legalized casino gambling. Each generation a new group of dupes.
bamagal62
(3,650 posts)That part of his word salad had me wondering what he was referring to. Now I know. So, the parent(s) would delay or lose SS by 24 weeks?? This needs to be shared far and wide.
lostnfound
(16,639 posts)Farmer-Rick
(11,407 posts)Instead of stock options for CEOs they could get Social Security options for every day off.
Weekends off could be compensated for by taking away more SS tax dollars that you paid in. The money could go to the corporation that lets you have weekends off.
A perfect solution for the filthy-rich.
jaxexpat
(7,787 posts)The lying and word salad rants are camouflage to fill the void in his head. The fact that it's all so disgusting and disturbing is pure Trump, like a neurotic diarrhetic cat covering its own poop.
Farmer-Rick
(11,407 posts)Of a lot of mental illnesses. Dementia, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia and other mental problems have this word salad as a symptom. Even severe grief can bring it on.
Circumlocution is what's it's called but in severe communication disruption due to dementia it also includes Visual agnosia, Semantic paraphasia, Superordinate responses, Pronoun substitution, which pedo Trump also displays.
"In early dementia, the word retrieval problems are very severe and cause a lot of this circumlocution, or people start to talk around things to a point where the the conversation gets really disrupted and it's kind of hard to follow the thread of what that person is saying."
https://www.adrc.wisc.edu/dementia-matters/how-language-and-conversation-can-help-detect-dementia#:~:text=In%20early%20dementia%2C%20the%20word,what%20that%20person%20is%20saying.
FemDemERA
(404 posts)jaxexpat
(7,787 posts)rubbersole
(8,517 posts)....it would look like Eric with a coin changer clipped on his diaper. And thirsty.
lostnfound
(16,639 posts)Can get further compressed by extra 24 weeks? 48 weeks? 72 weeks? of work before they finally get to freedom?
Squaredeal
(536 posts)Problem solved.
Skittles
(159,374 posts)just have GRANDMA TAKE A SABBATICAL and take care of things for a year!
erronis
(16,844 posts)Those $s sitting in SS are vitally needed as people start to (or want to) retire.
Amazing to what lengths these people will go to cause damage.
NNadir
(34,664 posts)...brain.
Hekate
(94,665 posts)NNadir
(34,664 posts)It indicates that the corrupt daughter and the clueless Senator from soon to submerge Florida may have had a scheme some years back with the implications stated, but the "idea" such as it was was rattling around in his increasingly dysfunctional tiny little brain like a BB in an otherwise plastic gumball machine sphere.
Trump's brain, which, let's face it was never of a high order, is rotting, and he was struggling to recall something he may have vaguely been told about some years ago but is no longer competent to understand.
highplainsdem
(52,367 posts)Squaredeal
(536 posts)Not the wealthy, who dont need SSI, or the poor, who often dont have jobs that dont pay enough to not stay at home.
Its really a disincentive for the middle class, the backbone of the nation, to have children.
Its asking these parents to give up their retirement for the sake of their children.
Gee, if my mom took advantage of this plan, considering how many children my parents had, she would have had to wait twenty years to collect her SSI, had she lived that long.
FakeNoose
(35,687 posts)This just proves that the Repukes can't ever be in charge of anything. Ever.
Squaredeal
(536 posts)If the question about childcare is asked.
Hekate
(94,665 posts)surfered
(3,116 posts)What he doesnt understand is that a tariff is a tax on foreign goods paid by the American consumers. So his plan will take in trillions of dollars from Americans.
Squaredeal
(536 posts)that rely on a significant number of foreign sales to help make them profitable, as other nations slap their own tariffs on imported American goods in retaliation.
surfered
(3,116 posts)CaptainTruth
(7,219 posts)Any high school student should be able to understand how tariffs work, who pays them, & how they can start "trade wars," but Trump clearly doesn't & he wants to set economic policy???
He also said he would be "taxing foreign nations," which is something a US President CANNOT do. The President, & in fact the US as a nation, has no power or authority to impose taxes on other countries.
Both of those are simple essential concepts that any candidate for POTUS should understand, but Trump clearly doesn't.
That is disqualifying (along with a laundry list of other things) & the media should be reporting on it & asking him follow-up questions, asking him to explain how he thinks tariffs work, who pays them, & how he thinks he & the USA has the authority to impose taxes on foreign nations. But him on the spot because his lack of fundamental knowledge is astounding.
prodigitalson
(2,884 posts)Walleye
(35,672 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 7, 2024, 05:47 PM - Edit history (1)
Frank D. Lincoln
(606 posts)valleyrogue
(1,098 posts)The GOP rightwingers have long considered subsidized childcare to be "socialist" as far back as at least Nixon. They will never back anything to help working parents, especially women.
As far as they are concerned, childcare is a woman's responsibility and needs to be done in the home by that woman, who has no business being in the workforce to begin with.