Missouri, Kansas, Idaho don't want to lose representatives in Congress. . .

[Collimator]

. . . So they need to ban abortion to keep up their population stats.

Do they also plan to build a wall and top it with barbed wire to keep people from moving out of state?

Here is a snippet from the content of the lawsuit these states are filing:

"Each abortion," they write, "represents at least one lost potential or actual birth." Because of this "loss of potential population," the states face "subsequent 'diminishment of political representation' and 'loss of federal funds,' such as potentially 'losing a seat in Congress or qualifying for less federal funding if their populations are' reduced or their increase diminished."

And further:

"Remote dispensing of abortion drugs," they assert, "is depressing expected birth rates for teenaged mothers."

By this reasoning, teaching sexual responsibilty is harmful to those states' bottom lines. Maybe they should legalize rape, or at least make it illegal for a woman to say "no".

[Tweedy]

1. These states elected Cons conveniently omit their vigorous

and ardent desire to torture pregnant women, and the people who love them, because they can thanks to Roe’s reversal.

One look at Texas’ increasing infant mortality numbers proves the sadism of these folks. They do not care about life. They do care about inflicting maximum suffering.

[sanatanadharma]

2. They could consider improving everyone's lifestyle and making their States attractive

They could consider improving everyone's lifestyle and making their States attractive so their youth would stay and others would come.

[MissMillie]

3. translation

"Pregnant people have the responsibility to supply the states with a population that will maintain their electoral standing."

[CTyankee]

4. Nazi terminology. they also wanted breeders to have NO choice but wanted the "undesirables" to be sterilized.