Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(115,611 posts)
Mon Oct 28, 2024, 05:02 PM Oct 28

Opinion - Justice Gorsuch's recusal may have doomed a man to death

There is considerable doubt about Richard Glossip’s guilt for a brutal 1997 murder in Oklahoma City, for which he has twice been sentenced to death. It also appears unquestionable that he has never gotten a fair trial.

Glossip’s case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, where his fate may actually be determined by the incoherence of the court’s recusal rules.

In a nearly unprecedented move, Oklahoma’s Republican Attorney General Gentner Drummond has joined the defense seeking a new trial for Glossip, on the ground that crucial exculpatory evidence had been unconstitutionally withheld from the defense in his earlier trials.

Under most circumstances that would be enough to resolve the case in Glossip’s favor, but that is not what happened. The Oklahoma courts denied Glossip’s petition, despite Drummond’s intervention, and the Supreme Court appointed an amicus curiae to argue in support of the conviction.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-justice-gorsuch-recusal-may-153000658.html

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Opinion - Justice Gorsuch...