The Hill: Supreme Court justices at work, bashing unions

[Omaha Steve]

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/labor/256728-supreme-court-justices-at-work-bashing-unions

October 13, 2015, 06:30 am

By Raymond Hogler

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is pursuing a vendetta against organized labor. As the point man for all things anti-union in the court's jurisprudence, Alito next will target teachers' unions in California. If he can persuade Justice Antonin Scalia to join the cabal along with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas, he can play the constitutional trump card against compulsory union dues in the public sector.

Alito galloped down this road in Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 and Harris v. Quinn. His strategy in those cases was to charge headlong off the reservation, throwing precedent to the wind, then recovering briefly to reach a narrow holding acceptable to his cronies. This time, Alito may take the posse along with him for the ride.

The plaintiffs in the teachers' case, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, argue that public-sector unions are by nature politicized entities, and that compulsory payment of any dues in states that allow union security is a violation of the objectors' constitutional rights. The controlling legal rule dates back to the Abood v. Detroit Board of Education decision in 1977 that upheld the right of a union to collect an agency fee from non-members for collective bargaining activities if the contract provided for union security.

The political dimension of public unions is hardly a new idea. In 1969, two prominent academics published a study in the Yale Law Journal pointing out that the social costs of public sector bargaining "are on the whole political." Despite that, public-sector unionization escalated rapidly in the 1970s and was widely accepted by government entities, including the payment of mandatory dues in many instances.

FULL story at link.

[RKP5637]

1. I think many Americans are completely naive failing to realize that many of the

benefits they have today were brought to them by the unions.

[Human101948]

2. Many are just fucking stupid...

They fall for the divide and conquer strategy of making them jealous of union benefits rather than demanding those benefits themselves perhaps by forming a union. Better that all working people be ruthlessly exploited.

[RKP5637]

3. Yeah, you said exactly what I was thinking, fucken stupid. I just don't get how so

many Americans love getting dumped on and saying thank you, and go trash the unions. I just don't get what's going on in their heads other than they are simply fucken stupid.

[appalachiablue]

4. Unions=democracy in the workplace. People who detest unions must want to work

40, 50, 60+ hours a week, have no weekends off, have no minimum wage laws, workplace safety and paid leave, and are fine with being fired at will. They're brainwashed to do the bidding of the right and ignorant of the enormous effort and sacrifice made by thousands who fought to obtain these protections over decades and what's being lost in order to hand over more profit to management.

Union protections and collective bargaining rights have unraveled quickly in last 40 years. Now only 7% of the public workforce is unionized down from 33% in 1953 during the height of middle class growth. The RW SCOTUS is committed to end it all.

[TBF]

5. Business as usual. nt