Socialism in America Is Closer Than You Think
http://www.thenation.com/article/socialism-in-america-is-closer-than-you-think/
Another promising strategy is to combine elements of these various approaches. There is no reason that large-scale enterprises couldn’t be structured as joint ventures that would include worker, community, and regional institutions. Many states and localities across the country collaborate to manage, regulate, and share the benefits of publicly owned electric utilities.
Roughly 25 percent of the nation’s electricity is, in fact, supplied by publicly owned firms and co-ops. In conservative Nebraska, every resident and business gets its electricity from a local public utility or cooperative. In both liberal and conservative states, examples of public ownership—municipally owned hospitals, hotels, convention centers, transit systems, ports, and airports, among many other services—are ubiquitous. A new politics might one day infuse these local efforts with fresh purpose and energy, and perhaps scale them up to the state or regional level.
None of this is to suggest that large-scale political change is imminent or inevitable. Social, economic, and environmental conditions—to say nothing of assaults on traditional liberties—are likely to get worse before they get better. For precisely this reason, the systematic development of a practical alternative to the status quo is critically important.
The change we need will not come from the top. As we’ve seen in countless ways, our current political system limits the potential for traditional progressive strategies. A new vision—one that encompasses fresh political strategies as well as new political-economic content—must be built from the bottom up. The overarching goal must be to develop a set of ideas that challenge the dominant ideologies and move the country in a fundamentally new direction.
= new reply since forum marked as read
like with Cruz blocking aid to every state but his (quietly keeping Texas in the Federal clover)
the GOP screams and bellows and hollers about Amtrak--but the money-losing lines are all in their poor, low-infrastrucutre-investment Red States and they'll ROAR if you try and cut the Empire Builder/Zephyr/SW Chief: they want the Pioneer back, the Desert Wind, a new TX-CO line through Amarillo, TX-OK-Chicago, an Atlanta hub, a commuter for Alabama: they'd get it and get the Northeast to pay for it all, and then scream and scream and scream about how Washington should butt out and not ever tax them
they can do this trick because they've carefully walled off their voters, flattering them that it's the Senator and not Washington that's bringing this stuff in, that it just pops out of the ground from nowhere for a deserving people
and they HAVE to do this because their states are the most dependent ones, and admitting it is admitting the failure of the system; so they have to make socialism into a bad word because it's the hand that feeds them
