Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumFor the SOCIALIST PROGRESSIVES GROUP members..........
There's a new article on the election posted on the League for the Fifth International's web site. Kind of an overview article by Marcus Otono. Because of the content I'm not going to link the article here, but here's a link to the general website.
www.fifthinternational.org
Check it out if you're interested in the take.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)I'd like to see a start on this by 2020 myself. It's too late for this years' election cycle, but 2020? Yeah, that's doable..
Nice.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)I was worried you had disappeared from here.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)As the article states, I have some heretical takes on bourgeois election as far as DU goes anyway. But I do check in every now and then.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)I won't comment on much of it here at DU, but this part:
That, and I'm a bit concerned about losing the momentum and energy built in the last year; the reality of November is disheartening. The 7th paragraph down from this one expresses exactly what is so frustrating.
I agree with the article's conclusion.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)I'm coming around to the belief that the far left needs a more mass party (at present it would be the Socialist Party IMO) to enter and become a "left current" within that party. This is similar to what's being done in Labour in the UK. Of course Labour has the advantage of actually BEING a workers' party, albeit a bourgeois one, whereas in the States we don't have anything comparable. Putting the energy and effort into a grouping that would actually be FOR workers first, NOT profit, would be a way to keep the momentum.
As to the seventh paragraph down, I don't really see any way around that conclusion.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I have little interest anymore for party politics, but a party that was actually about the masses could change that.
white_wolf
(6,255 posts)I don't know too much about them aside from the fact that they endorsed Sanders in the primaries. They seem to have some influence on electoral politics, though minor. Still they might have more power than say the Socialist Party or CPUSA, which everyone seems to regard as joke regardless of political leaning.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)and already somewhat established in a few places. I do know that in a lot of places they defer to the Democrat that's running, so that might be problematic depending on the candidate. I suppose after the November election it might be worth comparing the votes those two parties get.
CPUSA is the "left" (?) wing of the Democratic Party and has been for decades now, so I don't think that's a viable option. But check out the Socialist Party's platform. It's really close to what we need. Definitely close enough to enter and form a faction.
Response to socialist_n_TN (Original post)
tralala This message was self-deleted by its author.