Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 01:41 AM Oct 2016

After Clinton is elected...

...I think we need to get back to the issues.

Mr. Cole elaborates.
Issues we face of extreme importance are noted in the article.

Here's to hoping we can start pushing hard Left when this charade ends Nov 8th.


The Vanity of the Billionaires: Circuses and no Bread
By Juan Cole | Oct. 16, 2016 |


The US government offers a little bread in the form of welfare, but not much and much less than it used to. Most working people haven’t recovered from 2008. Mostly nowadays we are being offered circuses by the billionaires who now rule us.


Anything to avoid talking about the issues above. The mobs around Trump are mostly riled by the very inequality and injustice and lack of government services that he is campaigning to worsen, but have been fooled into thinking he is a populist by his swagger. And of course the Clinton campaign is inadvertently the beneficiary of these circuses as well, since otherwise its relationship to Wall Street and other centers of power and wealth would be headlines.


http://www.juancole.com/2016/10/vanity-billionaires-circuses.html
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Clinton is elected... (Original Post) SHRED Oct 2016 OP
I've never left them. LWolf Oct 2016 #1
Yeah but I'm wondering... SHRED Oct 2016 #2
Well, based LWolf Oct 2016 #5
I was treading lightly SHRED Oct 2016 #6
We can hope. LWolf Oct 2016 #8
And this from the article: guillaumeb Oct 2016 #3
We work like hell. Starry Messenger Oct 2016 #4
+10 SHRED Oct 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author tralala Oct 2016 #9
Note to hosts: I blocked tralala. Starry Messenger Oct 2016 #10

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
1. I've never left them.
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 08:10 AM
Oct 2016

The issues need to be front and center at all times, whether it's campaign season or not, and regardless of who is or isn't elected.

No election is suddenly going to make the billionaires and their circus disappear, so we should be pushing hard left NOW and until we effect the change we're working for.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
2. Yeah but I'm wondering...
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 09:31 AM
Oct 2016

...Will there still be a "loyalty oath" here on the DU post election?
Will we be allowed to critique Hillary if she strays too far over into the corporate rightwing world?

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
5. Well, based
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 08:11 AM
Oct 2016

on past experience, criticism will be allowed, and criticizers will be reviled. For at least 5 years.

Strays too far? Come on. Don't we both know where a Clinton administration will begin?

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
6. I was treading lightly
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 09:20 AM
Oct 2016

I know where she'll begin. Fortunately I think it is to the left of Bill. But then again, as many have said before me, "Bill Clinton was the best Republican president we've ever had"...lol.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
3. And this from the article:
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 01:59 PM
Oct 2016
Tax policy produces the class structure over time. In the 1950s, the top 1% owned about 25% of the privately held wealth in the US. Now it is close to 40%. What changed is mostly the tax structure.


Class structure is not an accident of politics, it is not "natural law" in action, it is a deliberate construct that works to concentrate power and wealth. The job of a government is to convince the bottom 99% via history books and political speech that this construct is the only logical way to structure a society.

Recommended.

Starry Messenger

(32,375 posts)
4. We work like hell.
Mon Oct 17, 2016, 07:21 PM
Oct 2016

I know no one cares what I post lol, but just in case--Hillary has been signalling an intent to work on issues like poverty and children.

Her new tax credit: http://www.npr.org/2016/10/11/497570475/new-clinton-child-tax-credit-could-help-low-income-parents-but-cost-200-billion

"Hillary Clinton on Tuesday rolled out a new tax break that, if enacted, would put more money into the pockets of working parents with very young children.

The Democratic presidential candidate said she would push for a doubling of the current $1,000 tax credit for children ages 4 and under. An estimated 15 million children would be eligible.

The new help would come in the form of a tax credit, which cuts the amount of federal taxes owed dollar for dollar. Translation: If you owe $3,000 in income taxes, but you have a new baby, your tax bill would fall to just $1,000.

Even people who earn too little to owe income taxes would get cash back from the U.S. Treasury. "It's just like the tax refund check that everyone else gets; it's dollars in your pocket," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center."

Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #4)

Starry Messenger

(32,375 posts)
10. Note to hosts: I blocked tralala.
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 03:53 PM
Oct 2016

This person self-deletes nearly every post they post in here. I don't consider that a good faith effort at being a member of the discussion here.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»After Clinton is elected....