Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,451 posts)
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 01:54 PM Dec 2016

Forward without caring about dues from racists


Which side are you on, now that Ol Man Trump's vile son is set to become the American President?

So the protests and resistance are beginning, and we're figuring out what this looks like. I am thinking about my role in the union movement, both as the servicing rep for 1300 bargaining unit members, but also much more now as a soldier in the labor movement as we face massive national and global consequences.

The labor movement needs to address the stresses inherent in selling our GOP union members on solidarity in their union when the political endorsements are overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates. Alienating the GOP members reduces dues revenue, and spurs talk of decert. That's a fact. We often skip that part of the conversation in order to focus on common denominators: layoffs, benefits cuts, and salary freezes, the common enemies. But racism and misogyny are the common enemies, too.

At Netroots last year, the AFL-CIO had a Labor Caucus, and there were less than ten of us there (no time or place on the notice). Tefere Gebre and Bill Spriggs talked about the imperative for white union members to talk to other white union members about white privilege and true labor solidarity, and to overwhelmingly defeat Trump so that the GOP rejects his racist and dehumanizing model of organizing. Well, we failed pretty spectacularly there.

I think the labor movement needs to stop dithering on this issue, restructure its revenue model, and recognize that our obligations to represent members will not be appropriately paid for by those members. Too many are going to choose to be free riders, especially where their membership has been a fait accompli due to agency shop. If we lose the support of those members when the labor movement, the economic justice movement, actually becomes indistinguishable from the Movement for Black Lives and the immigrants' rights movement, so be it.

We never really had it, and we need to stop caring about it. I think we still need to organize and reach out to all members, always. We don't have to demand ethical purity from our members. But we need to organize loudly and actively as a social justice movement, without any worry that some will be alienated. They will be. I am committed to fighting those people on civil rights, while still saving their jobs, enforcing their contracts, and preserving their retirement.

Labor needs to be an unapologetically vocal social justice movement, and raise our funds from engaged members and allies, inside and outside the labor movement. We need to do it now, before the next Friedrichs case, because now more than ever, we are on a war footing, and we have to speak clearly. Let's replace the revenue we will lose from the diehard racist and misogynist members with voluntary contributions from associate members who want bread and roses for everyone.

Which side are you on? That tune needs some fresh lyrics, and quick.

In unity,

(a friend of mine)
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forward without caring about dues from racists (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2016 OP
The "labor movement" has always been about social justice. yallerdawg Dec 2016 #1
For far too long, the labor movement, the union movement, guillaumeb Dec 2016 #2

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
1. The "labor movement" has always been about social justice.
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 02:16 PM
Dec 2016

While some unions, at times, have gone off the rails, what we need to recognize are the set-in-stone achievements and successes of the movement which are instilled in our laws and American values now.

Success has its drawbacks, one of them being, "What are you doing for me now?"

The Democratic Party and the "labor movement" are both needed most when they have something to fight for - not after we fought and won repeatedly - and now attention moves on to 'other' distractions.

What goes around, comes around.

We'll be back. Capitalism can't help but hurt, and we'll have a lot more to fight for!

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
2. For far too long, the labor movement, the union movement,
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 04:23 PM
Dec 2016

worked for white male workers. My union, the NALC, was primarily a white association, with black letter carriers belonging to the Alliance. That ended in the 1960's, but the labor movement prioritized economic issues far more than other issues without realizing that economic issues are only one part of the larger movement for true social justice.

When NAFTA was under attack, the labor movement watched. When Scott Walker attacked workers, the labor movement watched.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Forward without caring ab...