Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appleannie1

(5,203 posts)
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:39 AM Nov 2015

The Women Of The Supreme Court Now Have The Badass Portrait They Deserve

The women of the Supreme Court are the subjects of a new painting unveiled at the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C. on Monday.

The portrait features the high court's current female justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, as well as Sandra Day O'Connor, who retired from the bench in 2005. O'Connor made history in 1981 when she became the first woman ever named to the Supreme Court.

Artist Nelson Shanks was commissioned by collectors Ian and Annette Cumming to paint the portrait. According to the Smithsonian, the painting is on loan to the museum for three years.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/28/supreme-court-women-portrait_n_4171983.html?1383006537&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000008

?5

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Women Of The Supreme Court Now Have The Badass Portrait They Deserve (Original Post) appleannie1 Nov 2015 OP
Nice to see Sandra Day O'Connor again mdbl Nov 2015 #1
That's a great portrait BumRushDaShow Nov 2015 #2
I agree. brer cat Nov 2015 #3
What I caught my eye first was the mirror BumRushDaShow Nov 2015 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #5

mdbl

(5,488 posts)
1. Nice to see Sandra Day O'Connor again
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 05:14 AM
Nov 2015

Isn't she the swing vote that allowed GW Bush to steal the election and put us through eight years of hell? Could have left her out as far as I'm concerned.

brer cat

(26,296 posts)
3. I agree.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 07:51 AM
Nov 2015

I think the artist caught much of their personalities, and the eyes drew me in.

I noted right away the three empty flower pots outside the window...I hope the artist isn't subtly suggesting that the current three are empty vessels.

BumRushDaShow

(142,567 posts)
4. What I caught my eye first was the mirror
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 12:19 PM
Nov 2015

behind Sotomayor and Kagan, and how it reflected a full bookcase across the room... Plus the attempt to "balance" to composition due to their justices' staggered positioning, by having that red pillow and books next to O'Connor. You could basically divide up the canvas into 4 quarters (although I don't know if that AP photo includes the whole frame of the portrait). The window that you're talking about is very old-fashioned, looking out to a large foyer, so I thought it was interesting but did not pay much attention to the decorative containers thinking that this may have been done from both sketches of the women in position and photos of just the room (including the view through the window that may have been like that).

Response to appleannie1 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Artists»The Women Of The Supreme ...