Music Appreciation
Related: About this forum"Venus" -- Shocking Blue 🆚 Bananarama
Which version to you like the best?
7 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Shocking Blue | |
4 (57%) |
|
Bananarama | |
2 (29%) |
|
I can't decide, I like both versions. | |
1 (14%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
RainCaster
(11,654 posts)No click track, and the guitarist tweaks the pace just enough to make it interesting.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)Can I change my vote to this one????
wow!
Shermann
(8,723 posts)Anybody know what kind of guitar that is?
He's playing that song like a boss!
If you show up to a gig with a guitar like that, people will know you are simply not f'ing around.
EDIT: It appears to be a Danelectro Longhorn. Do want!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... it's an unusual design that I hadn't seen before (or if I saw it, I never gave it much of a thought.)
ProfessorGAC
(70,619 posts)That is, indeed, a Danelectro Longhorn.
Don't want it too bad, Sherm.
They don't play well.
Pickups were very noisy and the neck is more like a 2x2 than a guitar neck. Very blocky.
The pickups were the "lipstick case" style.
The remakes probably have better ones, though.
It's also fairly neck heavy. Lots of missing mass with those massive body cuts. I found it very uncomfortable to play standing up.
The originals did not use great wood (some Danelectros were plywood) so, that low body density lends to the heck heavy.
I can see the attraction to the looks, but there's a big reason why they went belly-up. Most DE stuff was junky.
Shermann
(8,723 posts)I'm not too into vintage guitars, but that one is so old-timey 60's that it appeals to me.
Randy Rhoads' Sandoval Flying V had a 60's Danelectro neck as the story goes. I think that guitar was mostly junk as well.
ProfessorGAC
(70,619 posts)...I'm guessing some shaving & shaping of the neck took place, as well. That would be way easier than scalloping the fingerboard.
I'd bet $100 that neck was nothing like an original Danelectro.
Shermann
(8,723 posts)Randy didn't play scalloped fingerboards.
I assume Sandoval did the bowtie inlay work on that neck, and may have shaved the neck profile as well. But mostly he just slapped it on there and refinished everything. Any luthier worth his salt makes their own necks, Sandoval was a hack who hit the jackpot. He's still making overpriced versions of that POS today.
ProfessorGAC
(70,619 posts)Not extreme the way Malmsteen & Vai did, but he had the frets dished out on most of his guitars.
Speaking of luthiers:
I knew a guy in the 70s. An engineer at a local nuke plant, pretty good guitar player who built acoustics.
He actually patented a special bracing pattern to allow a doubleneck (12 & 6) acoustic.
We bought tickets to, and sent a letter to Leo Kottke about it for when he came to play Wise Fools' in Chicago.
We went with the guitar, and my buddy gave it to Leo.
Leo used it that night!
About 3 years later, he gets a letter from Sigma. They wanted to buy his patent. They gave him $75,000 for it. (In 1980, so a serious chunk of change.)
Sigma made some (for Leo, I don't recall if they ever fully commercialized it). Roughly 6 months later, he got his original guitar back from Leo.
We both had a pic of Leo playing the original version. And, he got his original back.
Thing was a work of art.
I'd bet, given the quality of the wood (rosewood back & sides, spruce top, rock maple neck), the inlay, & craftsmanship it would fetch $8,000-9,000 today. Maybe more.
Shermann
(8,723 posts)...but the Sandoval didn't have a scalloped board, side profile here:
The Jackson Concorde is a well-documented guitar and definitely wasn't scalloped.
The '74 Les Paul wasn't scalloped either. Those were his three main guitars, so...
ProfessorGAC
(70,619 posts)...an article in Guitar Player where he talked about it.
Maybe he was just experimenting with it.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)When is that returning to hair fashion?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ProfessorGAC
(70,619 posts)The styles are so very different.
Straight rock vs. synth power pop.
So, I can't say which one I like better.
Which, I think, is testimony that it's a strong, strong tune.
Radically different versions, structurally, both good.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)The "Stock-Aitken-Waterman" influence is strong in the Bananarama version. They really had a hit-machine going on back then.