Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,766 posts)
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:28 AM Jul 2017

State treasurer to appeal whistleblower lawsuit

LITTLE ROCK, Ark.—Attorneys for Arkansas Treasurer Dennis Milligan say he will appeal a judge's refusal to dismiss a lawsuit, alleging fraud.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports that on Thursday Judge Chris Piazza rejected arguments by Milligan's attorneys that say their client is constitutionally exempt from such lawsuits.

An appeal of the decision would force an indefinite delay on the trial because the Arkansas Supreme Court is closed until September.

The plaintiff's attorney Luther Sutter says Milligan's appeal would be groundless, because it's based on a "last minute" defense argument that was abandoned at the beginning of the litigation in 2015.

Red more: http://www.texarkanagazette.com/news/arkansas/story/2017/jul/08/state-treasurer-appeal-whistleblower-lawsuit/681214/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State treasurer to appeal whistleblower lawsuit (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jul 2017 OP
Odd laserhaas Sep 2017 #1
There would be no incentive for anyone to be a whistleblower against the state TexasTowelie Sep 2017 #2
I agree with your logic; and would luv to see victory. laserhaas Sep 2017 #3

TexasTowelie

(116,766 posts)
2. There would be no incentive for anyone to be a whistleblower against the state
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 02:28 AM
Sep 2017

if sovereign immunity did apply. In these instances the public interest is served best by not allowing a sovereign immunity defense.

In this particular case there is an additional public concern because the treasurer is serving himself by distributing promotional materials and electioneering. The case should proceed and the treasurer should reimburse the state for the cost of the promotional materials, the time spent by state employees storing and shipping the materials, and any other shipping costs (e.g., postage).

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
3. I agree with your logic; and would luv to see victory.
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 02:38 PM
Sep 2017

But we've seen "color of law" all too often, being utilized, capriciously....in such instances.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arkansas»State treasurer to appeal...