Californians to vote on 7 ballot measures this November

[Auggie]

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California voters will weigh in on seven ballot measures this fall, the fewest to appear on a statewide general election ballot since 2014.

Thursday was the deadline to qualify measures for the November ballot. Secretary of State Shirley Weber confirmed that seven questions will appear in November. Six are ballot initiatives that supporters gathered enough signatures to place before voters and one was placed on the ballot by the state Legislature.

The seven (full details at the link below):

1) ABORTION: asks voters to amend the state constitution to guarantee a right to an abortion and contraceptives.

2 & 3) SPORTS BETTING: Two ballot initiatives would amend California’s constitution to make it legal to bet on sports in California. But they would do it in different ways. Both would only allow federally recognized Native American tribes to run sports wagering operations. The key question is how people would be allowed to place bets.

4) ARTS, MUSIC IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: This initiative, Proposition 28, would require lawmakers to use 1% of all state funding for public schools for music and arts education programs.

5) RAISE TAXES ON THE WEALTHY: This measure, Proposition 30, would raise taxes on rich people and use the money for wildfire prevention programs and incentives to help people buy electric cars to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

6) FLAVORED TOBACCO: This initiative, Proposition 31, asks voters whether a 2020 law that outlawed the sale of certain flavored tobacco products in California should take effect or be overturned.

7) KIDNEY DIALYSIS: This measure, Proposition 29, would require a doctor, nurse practitioner or physicians’ assistant to be present during treatment at an outpatient kidney dialysis clinic. This will be the third consecutive general election where voters have been asked this question. The two previous measures failed. This measure is backed again by labor unions who represent health care workers. And again, kidney dialysis companies are opposing it.

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-abortion-technology-sports-health-931f5355c7ff1c51211115726a0e4cb0

[jimfields33]

1. I'd vote yes to all but the last one

[AlexSFCA]

2. definitely no on 7 but need more info on 5 and 4

music and arts are fabulous but I much rather see more science. I want to know how the money will be spend from #5, if even some of that money to electric car manufacturers like tesla, then it is hard no. I want to see all of that money is spend on charging stations. We need to have a vast charging stations network - it is still abysmal, especially in comparison to gas stations.

[Auggie]

3. Charging stations. Mmmm ...

Helps people who already have electric cars or can afford them. It’s a great idea but IMO the sales incentives need to remain to help those with limited incomes.

I agree, though. Charging stations are a must.

[Retrograde]

4. Yes on 1, Maybe on 4 and 5

although I need more information so I'll wait until the voters' guide comes out (and see who's for and who's against), No on the others - and HELL NO WE TOLD YOU TWICE ALREADY on 7