California
Related: About this forumCalifornia Is Stuck With a Billion Pounds of Almonds
These days, almonds seem to constantly be in peril. The trees are reliant on bees for pollination, so almonds are susceptible to problems with bee populations. The crops also need large amounts of water, making them susceptible to drought. But now, California's almond industry is reportedly facing an issue that has nothing to do with the environment, but economics: Post-pandemic changes to the global supply chain have left producers struggling to export the almonds they have.
California produces about 80 percent of the world's almond supply, and 70 percent of those almonds are exported for sale, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. But exporting requires shipping containers, and those have been at a premium recently. It's reached a point where demand for containers in Asia was so high that, after dropping off their loads in Southern California, the containers were being sent back to Asia empty instead of taking the time to head north to the Port of Oakland, the primary export spot for almonds.
As third generation farmer and almond grower Scott Phippen quipped to the paper back in April, "You know what the number one export of the United States is over the last few months? Air."
The problem has persisted, and this week, the Los Angeles Times reports that almond exports are down about 13 percent this year, with around 1.3 billion pounds of almonds left undelivered. And California Almonds' May data shows that the uncommitted inventory of almonds was up 52 percent from the same period last year to over 660 million pounds. It's bad news for the state as a whole: Almonds were reportedly California's top agricultural export last year, worth about $4.7 billion.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/foodanddrink/foodnews/california-is-stuck-with-a-billion-pounds-of-almonds/ar-AAZhj5b
padfun
(1,856 posts)Almonds are top only if you skip our REAL cash crop.
sinkingfeeling
(52,993 posts)msongs
(70,172 posts)Grasswire2
(13,708 posts)I wonder.
If not, why not?
jimfields33
(18,869 posts)Normally almonds are 5 bucks a can. With this surplus they should be 1.50 a can. Maybe finally get a deal.
BigmanPigman
(52,251 posts)msdogi
(430 posts)Relatively easy to take care of, popular with corporate farmers, markets all over the world. Now, they are a real problem because we are in a devastating drought and they are water hogs, and the markets are no longer there.
Farmers are starting to tear them out, and either letting the land go fallow or planting something else. A lot of people here in CA are very glad to see them go.
Auggie
(31,798 posts)easy to care for and more importantly, requires less labor to farm.
A lot of non-farmers may be happy to see them go, but the people who sort, process, pack and ship will be out of work.
hunter
(38,931 posts)The factory farm meat and dairy industries are a horror show, bad for the animals and bad for the natural environment.
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)tirebiter
(2,587 posts)This is a failure of that system. I support the capitalist system but they have to pay for their own mistakes and not try to make everybody else pay for it.
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,937 posts)They were near the pull dates, so they were marked down to half-price.