Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Colorado
Related: About this forumColorado's Judge Crabtree's Summary Judgment Order re Same Sex Marriages:
So proud to have worked on this!
http://www.rplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014-07-09-Consolidated-Summary-Judgment-Order.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1677 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Colorado's Judge Crabtree's Summary Judgment Order re Same Sex Marriages: (Original Post)
kaiden
Jul 2014
OP
IllinoisBirdWatcher
(2,316 posts)1. "This argument is the legal equivalent of grasping at straws."
Gotta love how this Order summarized the state's faulty position.
It continues (bolding mine):
The States argument ignores the fact under its definition of government marriage, it still allows, and always has allowed, couples to marry who have neither the intent nor the ability to procreate. Unwed couples are as free to procreate after the Marriage Bans were enacted as they were before. The States definition of marriage flies in the face of Supreme Court decisions defining the real meaning of marriage.
and (bolding mine)
The Marriage Bans cannot withstand Equal Protection scrutiny under any standard of review.
and (again, bolding mine)
The sole basis for precluding same-sex marriage is self-evidentthe parties are of the same sex and for that reason alone do not possess the same right to marry (or remain married) as opposite-sex couples. The Court holds that the Marriage Bans are unconstitutional because they violate plaintiffs equal protection rights.
kaiden
(1,314 posts)2. LOVE this Judge!
At the oral argument when the assistant attorney general was arguing, "The only reason for people to get married is to procreate," Judge Crabtree (appointed to his judgeship by GOP Governor Bill Owens in 2001) replied, "I have two 65-year old friends who are getting married in two weeks. I can guarantee you that they will not be procreating." We all LOL'd. Doofus State of Colorado. Ha!
locks
(2,012 posts)3. Thanks Good work!