Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,245 posts)
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 04:34 PM Jan 2019

Court rules gov't can keep money seized in drug bust, even after suspect acquitted

From https://delawarestatenews.net/news/court-rules-govt-can-keep-money-seized-in-drug-bust-even-after-suspect-acquitted/

Court rules gov’t can keep money seized in drug bust, even after suspect acquitted

Jan 2nd, 2019 · by Craig Anderson

DOVER — A Dover man acquitted of drug charges and convicted of weapons offenses was denied in an attempt to regain $13,584 seized during a search warrant execution at his home in 2015, according to a Superior Court ruling issued last week.

Jeffrey Crippen was not entitled to three bundles of cash seized by Dover Police due to lack of documentation and proof that the money was legitimately earned, President Judge William L. Witham Jr. asserted in a 16-page order, .

While Crippen claimed in a 2017 petition that he received all the funds two years earlier, he testified at trial that some of the money was received as early as 2012 through work and personal loans, according to the Court.

The petitioner could not document a supposed $5,000 personal loan allegedly received, the court said, nor a business it was purportedly intended for, the judge determined. There was no evidence to support an alleged second $5,000 personal loan as well, the order stated.

...



More at link.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rules gov't can keep money seized in drug bust, even after suspect acquitted (Original Post) sl8 Jan 2019 OP
This is an example of why I don't support Kamala Harris Jake Stern Jan 2019 #1
I was not aware of her actions on that. Autumn Jan 2019 #2
Some light reading on Harris and asset forfeiture Jake Stern Jan 2019 #3
I looked it up when I saw your post, she was in my top 3 wants. I think that taking money from Autumn Jan 2019 #4

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
1. This is an example of why I don't support Kamala Harris
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 04:39 PM
Jan 2019

She vigorously defended asset forfeiture during her tenure as California AG and hasn’t repudiated the practice since.

Perhaps if she were to publically apologize to the people her office help fuck over directly or indirectly through asset forfeiture I might be more inclined to vote for her.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
3. Some light reading on Harris and asset forfeiture
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 05:55 PM
Jan 2019
https://www.montereyherald.com/2015/02/23/luis-alejo-kamala-harris-back-asset-seizure-before-criminal-charges/]

As California attorney general, Kamala Harris opposed a 2011 law restraining the practice of civil asset forfeiture. In 2015 she sponsored a bill to allow authorities to seize suspects’ assets before filing charges. That year California forfeitures totaled $50 million.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/cops-and-robbers-all-rolled-into-one-1500937471]

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/08/kamala-harris-trump-obama-california-attorney-general]

Autumn

(46,181 posts)
4. I looked it up when I saw your post, she was in my top 3 wants. I think that taking money from
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 06:04 PM
Jan 2019

people who haven't been charged with crimes is theft. If the gov wants their assets they can do it after a trial. To do it before they are found guilty is just wrong.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Delaware»Court rules gov't can kee...