Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 04:44 PM Sep 2020

Amendment 4 that is on the ballot.

I have found precious little two sided discussion on this amendment.

My gut is to vote against it. My primary reason is that the Amendment doesn’t place restrictions on the Governor and legislature if the amendment pass the 60% threshold twice. Right now, and 4 doesn’t change it, DeSantis and the Republican dominated legislature can simply decide that they don’t want to implement the voters’ will after a second vote passes citizens. We have seen what they did with the ex-felon vote amendment, and a rightwing US Appeals Court has backed them up.

Currently there are two republican driven bills in the legislature that would make getting an amendment on the ballot harder. One requires that the change meets a signature threshold in all 22 districts in Florida instead of the current 11 districts. The second is similar, raising the threshold in all 22 districts. Effectively both bills give a single red district veto power over all other districts.

I see 4 as a last ditch effort by republicans to maintain the upper hand in Florida, at all costs to citizens.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amendment 4 that is on the ballot. (Original Post) Blue_true Sep 2020 OP
I would rather a restriction on how many amendments on a ballot jimfields33 Sep 2020 #1
Exactly who would decide how many petitions to put on the General ballot? Blue_true Sep 2020 #3
I agree with you but remember 2018 was the 12 Amendments jimfields33 Sep 2020 #4
People don't have to vote on a petition. Blue_true Sep 2020 #5
That's true. I kinda forgot that. jimfields33 Sep 2020 #6
I used to leave Judge slots blank. Then I developed a habit Blue_true Sep 2020 #7
In Washington state... RainCaster Sep 2020 #2

jimfields33

(18,905 posts)
1. I would rather a restriction on how many amendments on a ballot
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 04:49 PM
Sep 2020

One year we had 14 or more and they really wanted 20 but some ended up not being on the ballot. 14 or more to too many. Most are approved.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
3. Exactly who would decide how many petitions to put on the General ballot?
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 05:10 PM
Sep 2020

I don’t trust the current republican majority legislature to do that, what would happen is they would keep off petitions that they don’t agree with, effectively vetoing the petition. My position is that if a petition meets the voter signature threshold and is not redundant of very similar to another petition that is up, it should appear on the ballot, regardless of the number. I am ok with similar petitions being combined and re-worded before being put before General voters, as long as the combination and wording retains the intent of the two petitioners.

jimfields33

(18,905 posts)
4. I agree with you but remember 2018 was the 12 Amendments
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 08:49 PM
Sep 2020

Do you think it may have turned off some voters who had to stand in line much longer then normal because instead of 10 minutes to vote it took 15 minutes or more.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
5. People don't have to vote on a petition.
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 08:56 PM
Sep 2020

If they don’t vote, that part of their ballot get counted as not voted.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
7. I used to leave Judge slots blank. Then I developed a habit
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 09:05 PM
Sep 2020

of looking up a Judge’s record and voting to retain that Judge or not retain that Judge.

RainCaster

(11,548 posts)
2. In Washington state...
Wed Sep 16, 2020, 05:06 PM
Sep 2020

There is a limit on citizen sourced provisions that says you can only do one thing in a citizen sourced (I'm paraphrasing here) amendment. So this would have to be done in multiple phases. I get the idea, and I'm behind the idea of restoring voter's rights. It may not matter in FL, however.

Could that billionaire from NYC pay the fees so that all these people could vote? That would solve the problem until the courts can step in. Certainly a quicker solution.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Florida»Amendment 4 that is on th...