Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Florida

In It to Win It

(9,635 posts) Wed Sep 7, 2022, 03:20 PM Sep 2022

Error Florida Supreme Court declines to vacate automatic stay, keeping 15-week abortion ban

Last edited Wed Sep 7, 2022, 08:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Emergency Motion to Vacate Automatic Stay

ORDER denying Emergency Motion to Vacate Automatic Stay

ORDER vacating previous order denying Emergency Motion

****The Court appears to have published an erroneous order. The Court's decision on whether to block the law or not remains undecided as of now (9/7/2022)

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

*Error* Florida Supreme Court declines to vacate automatic stay, keeping 15-week abortion ban (Original Post) In It to Win It Sep 2022 OP

Not a huge surprise FBaggins Sep 2022 #1

agreed In It to Win It Sep 2022 #2

Looks like the clerk made an error In It to Win It Sep 2022 #3

How interesting FBaggins Sep 2022 #4

FBaggins

(27,738 posts)

1. Not a huge surprise

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Wed Sep 7, 2022, 03:54 PM

Sep 2022

They presumably would have acted earlier if they were going to accept an emergency pace.

Still - it doesn't speak well for the chances of the 1989 ruling standing.

In It to Win It

(9,635 posts)

2. agreed

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #1)

Wed Sep 7, 2022, 03:55 PM

Sep 2022

In It to Win It

(9,635 posts)

3. Looks like the clerk made an error

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #1)

Wed Sep 7, 2022, 06:06 PM

Sep 2022

Vacatur

FBaggins

(27,738 posts)

4. How interesting

Reply to In It to Win It (Reply #3)

Wed Sep 7, 2022, 06:16 PM

Sep 2022

It appears that my initial take is off-base as well.

The state just filed its response to the emergency filing yesterday. We might read some support for the law into the fact that they didn't push the parties for an expedited briefing schedule, but we can't really read much into a lack of denying the emergency motion within seconds of receiving the response.

Reply to this discussion