Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Ninth Circuit rejects Hawaii rule to seal all medical records in court filings
https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-rejects-hawaii-rule-to-seal-all-medical-records-in-court-filings/Ninth Circuit rejects Hawaii rule to seal all medical records in court filings
A three-judge panel found that the public has a presumptive First Amendment right to see medical and health records attached to court filings, such as mental competency examinations.
HILLEL ARON / August 28, 2024
(CN) — A Ninth Circuit panel ruled Wednesday that Hawaii state courts can't require all medical and health records to be filed under seal.
"This mandatory, categorical sealing requirement applies regardless of whether a party is filing their own medical or health record, whether that record has already been made public, and whether the subject of the record believes sealing is necessary to protect any private information contained therein," U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Paez, a Bill Clinton appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel.
He added: "Because the First Amendment grants the public the presumptive right to access a substantial portion of the
records sealed under the challenged provision, and defendants have not articulated a compelling governmental interest sufficient to rebut the presumption of openness as to those records, we conclude that a substantial proportion of the challenged provision’s applications encroach on the public’s right to access these records, such that the provision is unconstitutionally overbroad."
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed in 2022 by the Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest — since renamed the Public First Law Center — a Hawaii-based public interest law firm dedicated to open government and transparency. The firm had been trying to unseal court-ordered competency evaluations of a man who'd been charged with assault and who claimed to have been hearing voices in his head, but was deemed fit to stand trial. After the man's convictions vacated, Public First sued the Chief Court Administrators of the Hawaii state courts, challenging the mandatory sealing provision as overbroad and in violation of the First Amendment.
[...]
A three-judge panel found that the public has a presumptive First Amendment right to see medical and health records attached to court filings, such as mental competency examinations.
HILLEL ARON / August 28, 2024
(CN) — A Ninth Circuit panel ruled Wednesday that Hawaii state courts can't require all medical and health records to be filed under seal.
"This mandatory, categorical sealing requirement applies regardless of whether a party is filing their own medical or health record, whether that record has already been made public, and whether the subject of the record believes sealing is necessary to protect any private information contained therein," U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Paez, a Bill Clinton appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel.
He added: "Because the First Amendment grants the public the presumptive right to access a substantial portion of the
records sealed under the challenged provision, and defendants have not articulated a compelling governmental interest sufficient to rebut the presumption of openness as to those records, we conclude that a substantial proportion of the challenged provision’s applications encroach on the public’s right to access these records, such that the provision is unconstitutionally overbroad."
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed in 2022 by the Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest — since renamed the Public First Law Center — a Hawaii-based public interest law firm dedicated to open government and transparency. The firm had been trying to unseal court-ordered competency evaluations of a man who'd been charged with assault and who claimed to have been hearing voices in his head, but was deemed fit to stand trial. After the man's convictions vacated, Public First sued the Chief Court Administrators of the Hawaii state courts, challenging the mandatory sealing provision as overbroad and in violation of the First Amendment.
[...]
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
