Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Illinois
Related: About this forumMore controversy over Satanic Temple display in Rotunda
* Sen. Chapin Rose (R)
I was appalled to learn that Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White, who manages the operations of the State Capitol, approved a satanic statute for display in the Capitol Rotunda during this holiday season. This absurdity is right next to displays that celebrate Christmas and Hanukkah.
The response given by Secretary White is that the First Amendment requires its display.
As one of the fiercest defenders of the First Amendment, I respectfully point out to Secretary White that his reasoning is terribly wrong.
The First Amendments free exercise clause specifically guarantees all religions the right to freely exercise their beliefs and practices. In this instance, the Christian and Jewish faiths are engaged in their Constitutional right to free exercise. The satanic cult, by its own admission (not to mention the law of common sense), is not a religion therefore, there is no claim to free exercise by such a group.
Indeed, its forced inclusion is robbing the Christian and Jewish believers of their own free exercise. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that government, in this case Secretary White, must force Jewish and Christian believers to include the satanic temple in their holiday celebrations indeed, such an interpretation can only be made through gross negligence or intentional misapplication.
Yes, the First Amendment allows for free speech, but it also allows for time and place restrictions. For example, if you reserve the public square for a certain time and place for your free speech demonstration that is your right. However, nothing requires anyone to double book the same time and place for another organization as Secretary White claims.
This is flat-out wrong, disrespectful, and hateful.
Secretary White should have declined this request to poke people in the eye especially during a holiday season of hope, love, and peace.
The response given by Secretary White is that the First Amendment requires its display.
As one of the fiercest defenders of the First Amendment, I respectfully point out to Secretary White that his reasoning is terribly wrong.
The First Amendments free exercise clause specifically guarantees all religions the right to freely exercise their beliefs and practices. In this instance, the Christian and Jewish faiths are engaged in their Constitutional right to free exercise. The satanic cult, by its own admission (not to mention the law of common sense), is not a religion therefore, there is no claim to free exercise by such a group.
Indeed, its forced inclusion is robbing the Christian and Jewish believers of their own free exercise. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that government, in this case Secretary White, must force Jewish and Christian believers to include the satanic temple in their holiday celebrations indeed, such an interpretation can only be made through gross negligence or intentional misapplication.
Yes, the First Amendment allows for free speech, but it also allows for time and place restrictions. For example, if you reserve the public square for a certain time and place for your free speech demonstration that is your right. However, nothing requires anyone to double book the same time and place for another organization as Secretary White claims.
This is flat-out wrong, disrespectful, and hateful.
Secretary White should have declined this request to poke people in the eye especially during a holiday season of hope, love, and peace.
Read more: https://capitolfax.com/2018/12/19/more-controversy-over-satanic-temple-display-in-rotunda/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1134 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More controversy over Satanic Temple display in Rotunda (Original Post)
TexasTowelie
Dec 2018
OP
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)1. It is a public space.
Open to the public.
This is free speech in action.
blur256
(979 posts)2. My Christian minister wife and I
Love this! We actually both love the satanic church for standing up for religious rights. They are fighting the good fight as far as we are concerned.
rurallib
(63,198 posts)3. So the guy would really scream if all the displays were removed
can't make him happy, I bet.