Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,050 posts)
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 05:36 AM Oct 2016

Was 5.8 earthquake just a foreshock? Kansas geologist asks

After the shaking from the 5.8 magnitude earthquake near Pawnee, Okla., subsided Sept. 3, Tandis Bidgoli noticed something unusual.

“I was very concerned,” said Bidgoli, a geologist with the Kansas Geological Survey, “because it didn’t appear there were any foreshocks to that event.”

In other large quakes, such as the 5.7 magnitude near Prague, Okla., in 2011, there had been other, smaller earthquakes before the big one. Scientists interpreted these earlier foreshocks as signs of a big one to follow.

But there were no foreshocks in Pawnee, Bidgoli said. The fault line was new. So she worried: What if the 5.8 quake, the largest recorded earthquake in the region ever, was itself just a foreshock? What if the biggest quake ever was just hinting at an even bigger quake to follow?

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article109811747.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was 5.8 earthquake just a foreshock? Kansas geologist asks (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2016 OP
Keep fracking! SCVDem Oct 2016 #1
 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
1. Keep fracking!
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 01:36 PM
Oct 2016

Also stand in front of a mirror at night and deny science 3 times.

So we need less regulation, eh?

Solar and wind are not to blame!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Kansas»Was 5.8 earthquake just a...