Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,771 posts)
Mon Jan 24, 2022, 11:33 PM Jan 2022

U-M study: Ivermectin doesn't treat COVID, but insurers pay for it anyway

Ivermectin likely doesn’t work against COVID-19, according to most research to date. But that hasn’t stopped insurers — sometimes using taxpayers dollars — from covering it, according to two University of Michigan researchers and a third researcher from Boston.

Paying for treatments that are not yet shown to be effective isn’t just “wasteful spending,” the researchers wrote, but will have additional costs if consumers forgo proven COVID vaccines in favor of a drug that is not likely to work should they become ill.

It’s an unusual twist in the usual complaints against insurers, U-M’s Dr. Kao-Ping Chua, who led the study, told Bridge.

“A lot of people get annoyed with (insurers) when they don't cover evidence-based treatments,” said Chua, a primary care pediatrician and health policy researcher at the U-M Medical School. “Here's an example where insurance is covering something that doesn't work.”

Read more: https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-health-watch/u-m-study-ivermectin-doesnt-treat-covid-insurers-pay-it-anyway

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U-M study: Ivermectin doesn't treat COVID, but insurers pay for it anyway (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jan 2022 OP
How many studies before we can declare this a BS solution? OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2022 #1
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Michigan»U-M study: Ivermectin doe...