Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,507 posts)
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 05:31 PM Aug 2016

Hinds Co. supervisors seek recusal of Judge Weill

The Hinds County Board of Supervisors is asking the state Supreme Court to remove Circuit Judge Jeff Weill from presiding over three cases where he ordered the county to pay for private attorneys for indigent defendants during a dispute with the public defender’s office.

This month, the Board of Supervisors filed a motion with the state Supreme Court asking for a review of Weill’s refusal to recuse himself from deciding whether the appointment of private attorneys was necessary in the cases of criminal defendants.

“Judge Weill should have followed precedent and recused himself from this matter for the limited purpose of deciding the propriety of attorney fees,” said Anthony Simon, an attorney for the Board of Supervisors, in the court motion. “Beyond Judge Weill’s precedent of recusing himself in similar matters and well-articulated in those orders, a reasonable person would question how Judge Weill can be impartial in deciding the necessity of appointment and fees when this Honorable Court has ruled that he exceeded his authority in barring the public defender’s office.”

Weill said in his refusal order that the Board of Supervisors has continued to refuse to comply with his order for payment of the attorney fees.

Read more: http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/local/hinds/2016/08/19/hinds-coount-supervisors-seek-judge-weill-recusal/88998906/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Mississippi»Hinds Co. supervisors see...