Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 05:54 AM Sep 2014

“This is a lot worse”: The wicked truth about the police’s favorite anti-protest tool

http://www.salon.com/2014/08/31/this_is_a_lot_worse_the_wicked_truth_about_the_polices_favorite_anti_protest_tool/



The flash-bangs fired by St. Louis County police trying to disperse crowds have raised questions about safety

“This is a lot worse”: The wicked truth about the police’s favorite anti-protest tool
Abbie Nehring, ProPublica
Sunday, Aug 31, 2014 12:00 PM EST

Peter Callahan was caught between two police lines in the West Florissant section of Ferguson, Mo., on Sunday night, when something fiery hot singed his leg. A nearby protester’s shirt briefly caught fire.

Callahan, a Washington D.C.-based journalist, deduced that he had been hit by a flash-bang device. “I was also at Occupy Wall Street,” he said. “This is a lot worse.”

Among the debris protesters and journalists have picked up in the days since Michael Brown was killed are canisters of the 7290 flash-bang made by Combined Tactical Systems, a “less lethal” diversionary device that has made its way into law enforcement agencies’ toolkits to carry out search warrants, and less frequently, to disperse crowds.

Flash-bang devices are one of many military-style weapons being used in Ferguson, along with tear gas and beanbag munitions. While marketed as non-lethal, there have been instances in which flash-bangs have caused serious injury and sometimes death when used by police, prompting debate over their proper use.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“This is a lot worse”: The wicked truth about the police’s favorite anti-protest tool (Original Post) unhappycamper Sep 2014 OP
Inexcusable abuse of the English language -- there is no "proper use" against civilians. nt eppur_se_muova Sep 2014 #1
The Military terminology would be: Offensive Grenade PeoViejo Sep 2014 #2
 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
2. The Military terminology would be: Offensive Grenade
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:20 AM
Sep 2014

They are used by assault troops to stun the enemy and disorient them. They have no fragmentation, except for the fuse mechanism, which allows them to be used in close quarters with little risk of injury to friendly troops.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Missouri»“This is a lot worse”: Th...