New York
Related: About this forumNew York must allow religious exemptions to COVID-19 vaccine mandate, judge rules
U.S. District Judge David Hurd in Albany, New York, ruled that the state's workplace vaccination requirement conflicted with healthcare workers' federally protected right to seek religious accommodations from their employers.
The ruling provides a test case as vaccine mandate opponents gear up to fight plans by President Joe Biden's administration to extend COVID-19 inoculation requirements to tens of millions of unvaccinated Americans.
...
Seventeen healthcare workers opposed to the mandate sued, saying the requirement violated their rights under the U.S. Constitution and a federal civil rights law requiring employers to reasonably accommodate employees' religious beliefs.
Read the rest at: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-york-must-allow-religious-exemptions-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-judge-rules-2021-10-12/
Wikipedia page on the Judge that issued the rule:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_N._Hurd
elleng
(136,055 posts)Bev54
(11,917 posts)Rhiannon12866
(222,154 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)From: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/religious-exemption-covid-vaccine-mandate/
"I don't think anybody is 100% clear. The EEOC's view of sincerely held religious belief is employers aren't supposed to challenge the sincerity of the belief," said Jason Reisman, co-chair of Blank Rome's labor and employment practice group.
thucythucy
(8,742 posts)are Christian Scientists, who oppose pretty much all medical interventions (and I take it this means they won't be going into any ER or ICU when the virus hits them).
The Pope has come out and said Catholics should get the vaccine.
I would think that fundamentalist Protestants and others who oppose vaccination should face the same scrutiny as draftees who want to claim conscientious objector status.
In fact it should be heightened, since draftees can make their claims under the first amendment, since it clearly covers government entities such as draft boards. I would imagine that arguing for such exemptions from a private entity would face a higher burden of proof--since their claims are in direct opposition to the rights of business owners to keep their work places safe for others.
Just my opinion--I'm certainly not an attorney or any kind of constitutional scholar.
Ka-Dinh Oy
(11,686 posts)able to show were in the Bible (whatever book that religion may have ) where it says that they are exempt from vaccine.
If they have had other vaccines then they need to show were their religions book tells them specifically not to get the COVID vaccine.
eppur_se_muova
(37,397 posts)... for the remainder of the pandemic.
They have no right to endanger the public because of their cockeyed "spiritual" beliefs.
Silver Gaia
(4,850 posts)There are others as well.
Now, whether most of those claiming such an exemption actually DO belong to any of these religions, well... that's another question.
And yes, they need to quarantine if they are refusing to vax.
piddyprints
(14,815 posts)I know someone whose 5-year-old has had almost no vaccinations, but is still allowed in school because of a religious exemption. This father follows no religion whatsoever, but claimed the exemption because hes convinced that a vaccination his son had in infancy caused his autism. No one questions it.
Religion is a a scourge that does far more harm than good throughout the world. If they claim an exemption for the COVID vaccine, they should be required to carry a card stating that all medical care should be refused if they catch it. No hospital admittance, etc.