Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,790 posts)
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 03:02 AM Oct 2016

Cleveland woman wins $1.3 million lawsuit against Giant Eagle for motorized shopping cart injury

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- A jury awarded $1.3 million a Cleveland woman struck by a motorized shopping cart at the Brook Park Giant Eagle.

Barbara Rieger was struck in December 2012 by Ruth Kurka, a fellow customer who lost control of the motorized shopping cart she used to get around the store, according to the lawsuit filed in 2014.

The impact threw the then-71-year-old Rieger about four feet. She struck her head against a shelf display and suffered neck and head injuries, the lawsuit says.

In the complaint, attorneys Thomas Wilson and John Wargo accused the store of failing to provide customers with the appropriate amount of instruction on how to use the cart.

Read more: http://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/index.ssf/2016/10/cleveland_woman_wins_12_millio.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cleveland woman wins $1.3 million lawsuit against Giant Eagle for motorized shopping cart injury (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2016 OP
Having done some 43 years in the business Sherman A1 Oct 2016 #1
I wonder if the response to this lawsuit will be to get rid of the electric wheelchairs Travis_0004 Oct 2016 #2
Or have the electric wheelchair user sign some kind of paper/contract No Vested Interest Oct 2016 #3
I think that is too much work. Travis_0004 Oct 2016 #4
It would be a lot of work. However, some stores not only highly value No Vested Interest Oct 2016 #5

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. Having done some 43 years in the business
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 04:03 AM
Oct 2016

I know that those carts and their drivers can be "challenging" at times to other shoppers, store employees and more than one cardboard shipper display through the years. I was never hit, but came close a few times and learned to keep my distance from them whenever possible.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. I wonder if the response to this lawsuit will be to get rid of the electric wheelchairs
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 06:09 AM
Oct 2016

That would be a hige step backwards for people with disabilities, but if the precident is set for 1 million dollar lawsuits it may be the easiest solution.

No Vested Interest

(5,196 posts)
3. Or have the electric wheelchair user sign some kind of paper/contract
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 12:23 PM
Oct 2016

releasing the store from responsibility.
Or have the electric wheelchair user acknowledge in writing his/her own responsibility for any damage that might be done. Paper to be kept on file at store, etc.

However, realistically, such means would not take the store off the hook, since the own and operate the vehicle, and those who sue always go after the deep pockets - i.e., the store rather than the individual.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
4. I think that is too much work.
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 05:05 PM
Oct 2016

You have to then lock the wheelchairs up and have an employee watch them sign the contract, then go unlock it.

Getting rid of them would be much easier.

No Vested Interest

(5,196 posts)
5. It would be a lot of work. However, some stores not only highly value
Wed Oct 12, 2016, 01:05 AM
Oct 2016

their senior shoppers, they depend on seniors for a large part of their income.

A grocery where I frequently shop is located adjacent to a large senior housing complex. You can be sure it is important to keep those shoppers coming back.

Hopefully, the accident described in the OP is a wild card unlikely to be repeated in most cases.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Ohio»Cleveland woman wins $1.3...