Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,207 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 07:23 AM Feb 2017

PERS changes would hit newer, younger workers harder

SALEM — State lawmakers got their first real glimpse Monday of the difficult political choices they face in seeking to curb the growing cost of public employee pensions this year.

Without changes, public school board members and superintendents argued at a public hearing that the Public Employees Retirement System will gobble up more and more of their budgets over the next six to 10 years, causing teacher layoffs and larger class sizes.

The system’s unfunded liability — the difference between its assets and the benefits it has promised — now stands at $22 billion and will grow further if the fund’s investments return less than 7.5 percent a year.

Lane County’s biggest public agencies, for example, are projected to have to pay a combined extra $18 million into PERS next fiscal year, an increase of around 20 percent. More big hikes are likely in 2019 and 2021.

Read more: http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/35279519-75/pers-changes-would-hit-newer-younger-workers-harder.html.csp#

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Oregon»PERS changes would hit ne...