Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ihaveaquestion

(3,143 posts)
Sun Jan 1, 2023, 12:25 PM Jan 2023

Racism corrected: Oregon court voids hundreds of split jury convictions

Oregon court voids convictions

Reverses an explicitly racist judicial practice:

Louisiana and Oregon are the only two states ever to adopt split juries in America, a practice the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed for both states in a 1972 decision that the court jettisoned in 2020. In the latter decision, the court ruled 6-3 that American juries were always meant to be unanimous.


But in Oregon on Friday, retiring Chief Justice Thomas Balmer took a different view. He traced the adoption of split jury rules in 1934 to the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in that state, and “efforts to dilute the influence of race and ethnic and religious minorities on Oregon juries.”

“We conclude that, when a criminal defendant’s guilt or innocence is determined by means of a trial before a 12-person jury, convicting the defendant on anything less than a unanimous guilty verdict violates our sense of what is fundamentally fair in a criminal proceeding,” Balmer wrote.


Oregon is currently one of the most progressive US states, but it's history is still in line with the US history of racism. Thank goodness there are still people willing to make corrections to historical injustices.

Thank you Oregon Supreme Court!
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Racism corrected: Oregon court voids hundreds of split jury convictions (Original Post) ihaveaquestion Jan 2023 OP
A fine step to healing. cbabe Jan 2023 #1
Even though now it's legal to live In Oregon, only 2.9 percent do. jimfields33 Jan 2023 #2
That's a good idea. ihaveaquestion Jan 2023 #4
It's a sad history for sure. ihaveaquestion Jan 2023 #3

cbabe

(4,176 posts)
1. A fine step to healing.
Sun Jan 1, 2023, 12:35 PM
Jan 2023
https://www.nationalgeographic.com › history › article › oregon-once-legally-barred-black-people-has-the-state-reconciled-its-racist-past

Oregon once legally banned Black people. Has the state ... - History

Oregon was the only state to enter the union with a constitutional clause that prohibited Black settlers from living and working in the state. When delegates later sat down to write the...

jimfields33

(19,015 posts)
2. Even though now it's legal to live In Oregon, only 2.9 percent do.
Sun Jan 1, 2023, 12:42 PM
Jan 2023

I bet the reputation is still in people’s mind. A little more then 70,000 blacks live in Oregon. Kinda low big time. They should do a welcome campaign for them. It’s the least the state could do for their abhorrent history.

ihaveaquestion

(3,143 posts)
3. It's a sad history for sure.
Sun Jan 1, 2023, 12:55 PM
Jan 2023

Unfortunately the remnants of it are still here. I've only lived here a year and have seen/heard no blatant racism, but I'm white and not likely to encounter it directly.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Oregon»Racism corrected: Oregon ...