Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Oregon
Related: About this forumRacism corrected: Oregon court voids hundreds of split jury convictions
Oregon court voids convictionsReverses an explicitly racist judicial practice:
Louisiana and Oregon are the only two states ever to adopt split juries in America, a practice the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed for both states in a 1972 decision that the court jettisoned in 2020. In the latter decision, the court ruled 6-3 that American juries were always meant to be unanimous.
But in Oregon on Friday, retiring Chief Justice Thomas Balmer took a different view. He traced the adoption of split jury rules in 1934 to the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in that state, and efforts to dilute the influence of race and ethnic and religious minorities on Oregon juries.
We conclude that, when a criminal defendants guilt or innocence is determined by means of a trial before a 12-person jury, convicting the defendant on anything less than a unanimous guilty verdict violates our sense of what is fundamentally fair in a criminal proceeding, Balmer wrote.
Oregon is currently one of the most progressive US states, but it's history is still in line with the US history of racism. Thank goodness there are still people willing to make corrections to historical injustices.
Thank you Oregon Supreme Court!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 3009 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Racism corrected: Oregon court voids hundreds of split jury convictions (Original Post)
ihaveaquestion
Jan 2023
OP
cbabe
(4,176 posts)1. A fine step to healing.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com history article oregon-once-legally-barred-black-people-has-the-state-reconciled-its-racist-past
Oregon once legally banned Black people. Has the state ... - History
Oregon was the only state to enter the union with a constitutional clause that prohibited Black settlers from living and working in the state. When delegates later sat down to write the...
Oregon once legally banned Black people. Has the state ... - History
Oregon was the only state to enter the union with a constitutional clause that prohibited Black settlers from living and working in the state. When delegates later sat down to write the...
jimfields33
(19,015 posts)2. Even though now it's legal to live In Oregon, only 2.9 percent do.
I bet the reputation is still in peoples mind. A little more then 70,000 blacks live in Oregon. Kinda low big time. They should do a welcome campaign for them. Its the least the state could do for their abhorrent history.
ihaveaquestion
(3,143 posts)4. That's a good idea.
Everyone I've met here is very nice and something like that could work I think.
ihaveaquestion
(3,143 posts)3. It's a sad history for sure.
Unfortunately the remnants of it are still here. I've only lived here a year and have seen/heard no blatant racism, but I'm white and not likely to encounter it directly.