Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Spotlight: How we tracked workplace lawsuits involving Pa.'s medical marijuana law
Byline: by Ed Mahon of Spotlight PA | Oct. 7, 2022
(link) https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2022/10/pa-medical-marijuana-employment-lawsuits/?mc_cid=290e5c6b8c&mc_eid=3ab2f24ac3
Our months-long investigation into employment protections for medical marijuana patients began with an email about a failed drug test.
After a drug screening indicated he had used marijuana, Philadelphia Gas Works employee Todd Douglas told me he faced a troubling choice: Give up a doctor-approved drug that provided pain relief, or risk his job. As our reporting explained, Douglas fought the drug test and won. Other medical marijuana patients weren’t so lucky.
When I started working on the investigation, two questions surfaced: How many people find themselves in Douglas’ situation? And what happens to them?
There’s no simple answer, but I used a number of techniques to understand the issue. I did a lot of interviews with advocates and attorneys, of course. But I knew not everyone would want to talk — and confidentiality agreements could pose problems for some if they did. We wanted to understand those situations, too.
I analyzed about 20 medical marijuana employment cases, filed dozens of open records requests, and reviewed thousands of pages of public records. All of these steps were necessary to understand how decisions made by lawmakers in Harrisburg and Washington, D.C., affect hundreds of thousands of patients across the state. Here’s a look at some of the tools we used to understand the scope and the stakes in Pennsylvania.
After a drug screening indicated he had used marijuana, Philadelphia Gas Works employee Todd Douglas told me he faced a troubling choice: Give up a doctor-approved drug that provided pain relief, or risk his job. As our reporting explained, Douglas fought the drug test and won. Other medical marijuana patients weren’t so lucky.
When I started working on the investigation, two questions surfaced: How many people find themselves in Douglas’ situation? And what happens to them?
There’s no simple answer, but I used a number of techniques to understand the issue. I did a lot of interviews with advocates and attorneys, of course. But I knew not everyone would want to talk — and confidentiality agreements could pose problems for some if they did. We wanted to understand those situations, too.
I analyzed about 20 medical marijuana employment cases, filed dozens of open records requests, and reviewed thousands of pages of public records. All of these steps were necessary to understand how decisions made by lawmakers in Harrisburg and Washington, D.C., affect hundreds of thousands of patients across the state. Here’s a look at some of the tools we used to understand the scope and the stakes in Pennsylvania.
- more at link -
There's no question that certain employers penalize certain workers for positive drug test results, and mostly it's for insurance liability reasons. But marijuana use should not be thrown into that drug-screening mix because it's no danger to anyone and the medical field has shown acceptance for medical marijuana use. Perhaps President Biden's blanket pardon for all Americans who received simple convictions for marijuana possession in the last 30 years will encourage our state's employers to tone down their drug snooping.