Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pennsylvania
Related: About this forumBreaking: Pa. House votes to allow childhood sexual abuse survivors to sue
This story will be updated.
HARRISBURG Survivors of childhood sexual abuse scored yet another victory in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on Friday in their long-awaited quest for a chance for justice against their abuser.
By a 161-40 vote, the House passed a proposed constitutional amendment that would seek to provide a two-year window for victims of child sexual abuse otherwise barred by the statute of limitations to file civil claims against their abuser and any institution that covered it up.
It also passed by a 134-67 vote a bill that would provide for that window through the regular law-making process. Neither falls in line with the legislation the Senate passed in January to provide civil legal recourse for abuse survivors, so they have no reason to celebrate yet.
Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman, R-Indiana County, has indicated repeatedly that he intends the package of three proposed constitutional amendments one of which provided for the statute of limitations reform for childhood sexual abuse survivors to be the final time the chamber deals with that issue.
Until the two chambers can agree on the same measure to provide this legal recourse for abuse victims, there remains no chance of them getting it. First Published February 24, 2023, 11:55am
HARRISBURG Survivors of childhood sexual abuse scored yet another victory in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on Friday in their long-awaited quest for a chance for justice against their abuser.
By a 161-40 vote, the House passed a proposed constitutional amendment that would seek to provide a two-year window for victims of child sexual abuse otherwise barred by the statute of limitations to file civil claims against their abuser and any institution that covered it up.
It also passed by a 134-67 vote a bill that would provide for that window through the regular law-making process. Neither falls in line with the legislation the Senate passed in January to provide civil legal recourse for abuse survivors, so they have no reason to celebrate yet.
Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman, R-Indiana County, has indicated repeatedly that he intends the package of three proposed constitutional amendments one of which provided for the statute of limitations reform for childhood sexual abuse survivors to be the final time the chamber deals with that issue.
Until the two chambers can agree on the same measure to provide this legal recourse for abuse victims, there remains no chance of them getting it. First Published February 24, 2023, 11:55am
- short article, no more at link -
It's a start, but they could do a lot more. Let's celebrate this small victory.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1183 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Pa. House votes to allow childhood sexual abuse survivors to sue (Original Post)
FakeNoose
Feb 2023
OP
bucolic_frolic
(47,002 posts)1. Only thing worries me here is retroactive precedent
I thought there were no ex-post facto laws allowed?
temporary311
(957 posts)2. Abusing children was already illegal,
so I'm not sure if that reasoning applies here. This just modifies the statute of limitations.
bucolic_frolic
(47,002 posts)5. See? There are these nuances that I the non-lawyer don't fully grasp
getagrip_already
(17,440 posts)3. Where did kav go to skul?
Asking for a friend.
FakeNoose
(35,690 posts)4. Do you mean Brett Kavanaugh?
He grew up in Maryland and went to the Georgetown Prep for high school. After that I think he went to Yale.
If it's not Justice Kavanaugh you're asking about, please let me know.
getagrip_already
(17,440 posts)6. yeah, it was brett.....
Now we just need MD to pass a similar bill.
Tx