Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pennsylvania
Related: About this forumShould Scott Perry (R) PA-10 be allowed to run for re-election?
A liberal activist wants a Pennsylvania court to bar U.S. Rep. Scott Perry from the states primary ballot, arguing that Perry engaged in insurrectionist activity and cannot appear on the states ballot under the Constitutions insurrection clausePittsburgh Post-Gazette link: https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2024/01/03/pennsylvania-constitution-insurrection-scott-perry-ballot/stories/202401030064
HARRISBURG A liberal activist asked a Pennsylvania court on Tuesday to bar U.S. Rep. Scott Perry from the states primary ballot, arguing that Mr. Perry isnt eligible because of his efforts to keep President Donald Trump in office and block the transfer of power to Democrat Joe Biden.
The seven-page lawsuit asks Pennsylvania's Commonwealth Court to declare that Mr. Perry engaged in insurrectionist activity and cannot hold public office under the Constitutions insurrection clause. The lawsuit by activist Gene Stilp names Mr. Perry and Pennsylvania's secretary of state, Al Schmidt.
Mr. Perry, a Republican, is expected to run for a seventh term, although candidates cannot file paperwork yet to qualify for Pennsylvania's April 23 primary ballot.
In part, the filing cites Mr. Perry's role in trying to use the Department of Justice to help Mr. Trump stall the certification of the election by installing an acting U.S. attorney general who would be receptive to Mr. Trumps false claims of election fraud.
- more at link -
The seven-page lawsuit asks Pennsylvania's Commonwealth Court to declare that Mr. Perry engaged in insurrectionist activity and cannot hold public office under the Constitutions insurrection clause. The lawsuit by activist Gene Stilp names Mr. Perry and Pennsylvania's secretary of state, Al Schmidt.
Mr. Perry, a Republican, is expected to run for a seventh term, although candidates cannot file paperwork yet to qualify for Pennsylvania's April 23 primary ballot.
In part, the filing cites Mr. Perry's role in trying to use the Department of Justice to help Mr. Trump stall the certification of the election by installing an acting U.S. attorney general who would be receptive to Mr. Trumps false claims of election fraud.
I just returned from my holiday visit to the Big Apple, and this amazing story has greeted me in our hometown paper the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Wow! What a way to start the New Year.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2515 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Scott Perry (R) PA-10 be allowed to run for re-election? (Original Post)
FakeNoose
Jan 2024
OP
onecaliberal
(35,674 posts)1. He is also not qualified to appear on the ballot.
FakeNoose
(35,514 posts)2. Let's hope the PA courts agree!
twodogsbarking
(12,228 posts)3. He ain't right in the head.
meow2u3
(24,912 posts)4. He's an insurrectionist. He belongs off the ballot
The Constitution is clear. Anyone who either engages in insurrection or rebellion must be DQd without 2/3 of both houses of Congress overruling. And he's not going to get 2/3 of either house of Congress.
Only question is, will repukes twist the Constitution to deny the obvious, a riot in furtherance of a still ongoing insurrection?