Virginia
Related: About this forumGoodbye, generals
State supreme court rules city can take down Confederate statuesThe Virginia Supreme Court ruled that Charlottesville can legally take down the statues of Confederate Generals Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee. PC: Staff photo
For nearly a century, Charlottesvilles downtown statues of Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson have stood as brutal emblems of white supremacy. Local Black activists have fought long and hard for the bronze eyesores to be taken down for good, but the city has faced a string of roadblocks over the past four years: a lawsuit, an injunction, and, notoriously, the white supremacist Unite the Right rally.
Finally, the painful battle seems to have an end in sight.
On April 1, the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a Charlottesville Circuit Court decision that barred the city from removing the monuments. The lower court had ruled that the city couldnt meddle with the monuments because the statues were protected by a 1997 law preventing localities from moving so-called war memorials. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the law did not apply to statues erected before that date, and thus did not apply to Charlottesvilles segregation-era monuments.
Both the Lee and Jackson statues were erected in the 1920s, in the midst of the Jim Crow era and at the height of Ku Klux Klan membership.
This court decision will positively impact so many lives, said Mayor Nikuyah Walker in a city press release. I want to express gratitude to Zyahna Bryant, Dr. Wes Bellamy, and Kristin Szakos for igniting the sparks that started this local mini-revolution. We are forever indebted to the community for their steadfastness and perseverance.
Read more: https://www.c-ville.com/goodbye-generals
(Charlottesville Weekly)
twodogsbarking
(12,228 posts)of the leaders of the 1/6 mob. Same thing.
MiHale
(10,784 posts)3Hotdogs
(13,403 posts)He never did nuthin' to nobody.
JohnnyRingo
(19,315 posts)I guess it wouldn't be bad to unsaddle General Lee and leave the legs dangling on each side, but someone would complain that the horse was complicit.
NCjack
(10,297 posts)Celerity
(46,212 posts)dlk
(12,378 posts)Time to say goodbye to the nudge, nudge, wink, wink monuments to racism and slavery.
FakeNoose
(35,697 posts)They could be displayed at museums or at some private setting as long as a private citizen or group undertakes the maintenance cost. I believe the issue is with public funds being used for these Civil War memorials, and the improper use of community-owned property.
Why should a city, county or state park be the setting for a monument that is dedicated to a racist war figure? If a private citizen were to buy the monument and donate it to a museum, or display it on private property, it's another story.