Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Sun Mar 1, 2015, 10:28 AM Mar 2015

Tomblin: Morrisey has facts wrong in Supreme Court ACA brief

Charleston Gazette
Tomblin: Morrisey has facts wrong in Supreme Court ACA brief

by David Gutman, Staff writer
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take away the federal subsidies that about 30,000 West Virginians receive to buy health coverage on the insurance exchange set up by the Affordable Care Act.

But Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, who made the decisions about that exchange in West Virginia, says Morrisey has the facts wrong regarding how it was set up.

Morrisey, in a brief to the court filed with five other Republican state attorneys general, says that when state officials, like Tomblin, chose to let the federal government help set up their insurance exchanges, they knew they could be forgoing millions of dollars in subsidies for state residents. That’s not true, Tomblin says, and documents and reports from the time support his case.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in King v. Burwell, a lawsuit that argues that subsidies to help people buy private insurance under President Obama’s health-care law should be available only to citizens who live in states that established their own health insurance exchange.

The lawsuit hinges on one sentence of the 955-page law. That provision, in section 36B, limits subsidies to people who purchased insurance “through an exchange established by the State.” In states that do not establish an exchange, the law tells the federal government to set up exchanges instead (37 states use at least a partially federal exchange). The lawsuit argues that, because those exchanges were not “established by the State,” people in those states should not get subsidized insurance.

More
http://www.wvgazette.com/article/20150301/GZ01/150309967

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»West Virginia»Tomblin: Morrisey has fac...