Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Canada
Related: About this forum'Free to go': U.S. man acquitted in seizure of 56 handguns at border
https://windsorstar.com/news/local-news/youre-free-to-go-u-s-man-acquitted-of-charges-in-seizure-of-56-handguns-at-border/wcm/93ec71fb-0a7c-49be-9e2c-78e518e262d6Free to go: U.S. man acquitted in seizure of 56 handguns at border
A Florida man arrested more than a year ago at the Blue Water Bridge amid what officials said was one of the largest gun seizures at a Southwestern Ontario border in recent memory has been acquitted of all charges at trial and finally permitted to return to the U.S.
Author of the article:Terry Bridge Sarnia Observer
Published Dec 15, 2022 Last updated 1 day ago 3 minute read
A Florida man arrested more than a year ago at the Blue Water Bridge in what officials described as one of the largest gun seizures at a Southwestern Ontario border in recent memory was acquitted of all charges at trial and finally permitted to return to the U.S.
Vivian Richards, 48, initially faced nine charges after border officials said 56 handguns the majority missing serial numbers and 100 rounds of ammo were found in boxes in the trunk of his rental car at the bridge between Michigan and the Sarnia area on Nov. 1, 2021. After spending several weeks that fall in the Sarnia Jail, the delivery driver from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., was released around Christmas on $18,000 bail and GPS tracking, but with an order to stay in Sarnia or Point Edward until his trial was over.
The Crown only opted to prosecute two of the nine charges making false or deceptive statements under the Customs Act and possessing a firearm knowing that the serial number on it has been altered, defaced or removed under the Criminal Code. After Richards pleaded not guilty, what was expected to be a two-day trial was finally held in September with a third day in October.
Richards testified Oct 14 and denied knowing what was in the boxes when he inadvertently crossed into Canada while following GPS directions from his pickup point in Warren, Mich., to his dropoff spot in Malone, N.Y.
[...]
A Florida man arrested more than a year ago at the Blue Water Bridge amid what officials said was one of the largest gun seizures at a Southwestern Ontario border in recent memory has been acquitted of all charges at trial and finally permitted to return to the U.S.
Author of the article:Terry Bridge Sarnia Observer
Published Dec 15, 2022 Last updated 1 day ago 3 minute read
A Florida man arrested more than a year ago at the Blue Water Bridge in what officials described as one of the largest gun seizures at a Southwestern Ontario border in recent memory was acquitted of all charges at trial and finally permitted to return to the U.S.
Vivian Richards, 48, initially faced nine charges after border officials said 56 handguns the majority missing serial numbers and 100 rounds of ammo were found in boxes in the trunk of his rental car at the bridge between Michigan and the Sarnia area on Nov. 1, 2021. After spending several weeks that fall in the Sarnia Jail, the delivery driver from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., was released around Christmas on $18,000 bail and GPS tracking, but with an order to stay in Sarnia or Point Edward until his trial was over.
The Crown only opted to prosecute two of the nine charges making false or deceptive statements under the Customs Act and possessing a firearm knowing that the serial number on it has been altered, defaced or removed under the Criminal Code. After Richards pleaded not guilty, what was expected to be a two-day trial was finally held in September with a third day in October.
Richards testified Oct 14 and denied knowing what was in the boxes when he inadvertently crossed into Canada while following GPS directions from his pickup point in Warren, Mich., to his dropoff spot in Malone, N.Y.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1747 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Free to go': U.S. man acquitted in seizure of 56 handguns at border (Original Post)
sl8
Dec 2022
OP
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)1. I wonder if the BATFE will pursue the man now?
Guns with defaced serial numbers are a big no-no.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(2,166 posts)2. After that West Virginia ruling
Not sure if they will bother.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/ban-guns-with-serial-numbers-removed-is-unconstitutional-us-judge-2022-10-13/]
Oct 13 (Reuters) - A federal judge in West Virginia has ruled that a federal ban on possessing a gun with its serial number removed is unconstitutional, the first such ruling since the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically expanded gun rights in June.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin in Charleston on Wednesday found that the law was not consistent with the United States' "historical tradition of firearm regulation," the new standard laid out by the Supreme Court in its landmark ruling.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin in Charleston on Wednesday found that the law was not consistent with the United States' "historical tradition of firearm regulation," the new standard laid out by the Supreme Court in its landmark ruling.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)3. Wow, that ruling of his was...well, it was something.
"U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin ruled that no historical legal standard exists to demonstrate that firearms without a serial number are more dangerous or unusual than firearms with a serial number because in 1791 [date of the Second Amendment] serial numbers were not commonly used."