'Preventing poverty' not a valid goal for tax purposes, CRA tells Oxfam Canada

[applegrove]

'Preventing poverty' not a valid goal for tax purposes, CRA tells Oxfam Canada

The Canadian Press/CBC News

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/preventing-poverty-not-a-valid-goal-for-tax-purposes-cra-tells-oxfam-canada-1.2717774

"SNIP..........................


The Canada Revenue Agency has told a well-known charity that it can no longer try to prevent poverty around the world if it wants to keep its charitable status for tax purposes. It can only alleviate poverty — because preventing poverty might benefit people who are not already poor.

The bizarre bureaucratic brawl over a mission statement is yet more evidence of deteriorating relations between the Harper government and some parts of Canada's charitable sector.

The lexical scuffle began when Oxfam Canada filed papers with Industry Canada to renew its non-profit status, as required by Oct. 17 this year under a law passed in 2011.

Ottawa-based Oxfam initially submitted wording that its purpose as a charity is "to prevent and relieve poverty, vulnerability and suffering by improving the conditions of individuals whose lives, livelihood, security or well-being are at risk."




...........................SNIP"

[Joe Shlabotnik]

1. What a friggin' witch hunt

I hope the next government goes public, and destroys this authoritarian brand of conservatism forever.

[Ken Burch]

2. It's almost like the story on the (satirical website) "The Beaverton"

in which Revenue Canada denies tax-exempt status to the Canadian Cancer society because of it's pronounced "anti-cancer" bias.