United Kingdom
Related: About this forumTrump's plan for new homes in Scotland backed by officials
Source: The Guardian
Controversial proposal for 550 luxury homes near golf club recommended for approval
Severin Carrell Scotland editor
Wed 20 Mar 2019 14.46 GMT
Planners in Aberdeenshire have backed Donald Trumps controversial plans to build up to 550 luxury homes near his golf course, despite a record number of objections.
The councils planning officers said the scheme, due to be built in phases at a cost of around £25m, had considerable merit for the local economy and recommended that it is approved by the council next month, subject to conditions.
But the US presidents opponents furiously accused planners of overlooking more than 20,000 objections, including those from the local community council, transport officials and 18,722 people who signed a petition organised by the online platform 38 Degrees.
Cllr Martin Ford, Trumps most prominent critic on the council, said the proposals ignored the promises made in 2008 when Trump first won permission to build a £750m golfing and holiday resort on the site, overriding legal protections for its rare coastal dunes.
Ford said the 2008 masterplan was being used as a Trojan horse to allow Trump to build a profitable housing estate, without any of the the extra jobs, amenities and investment he promised. The housing plans also breached a series of conditions in the local development plan, he said.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/20/trump-plan-new-homes-scotland-backed-officials-aberdeenshire
msongs
(70,178 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)the windmill lawsuit go?
And hasn't Aberdeen depended on North Sea oil for jobs? Are the oilfields running dry?
Denzil_DC
(7,949 posts)The planning officers are nominally non-partisan, but politicians in the area, which is seriously short of funds, have a history of sucking up to Trump.
I know a couple who're involved in planning up in Aberdeenshire. According to them, the economics of Trump's Menie golf development didn't make any sense without an extensive housing element. But the scale of investment to date is far, far short of what was promised when Trump first gained planning approval, and the idea of plonking so many houses in a rural area without the accompanying investment in amenities and infrastructure is ridiculous.
On the other hand, Trump had threatened to go away in a huff after the Vattenfall experimental offshore windfarm, which he bitterly opposed, was granted approval a few years ago.
A similar situation is playing out at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Ayrshire, where a major housing development on farmland is slated.