Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
Related: About this forum(UK) Covid: 16,000 coronavirus cases missed in daily figures after IT error
Nearly 16,000 cases of coronavirus were not entered into the national computer system used for official figures because of a technical glitch, Public Health England says.
Some of the unreported cases were added to Saturday's figure of 12,872 new cases and Sunday's figure of 22,961.
It said all of the cases "received their Covid-19 test result as normal".
But BBC Health Editor Hugh Pym said it meant the contacts of those who tested positive had not been approached.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54412581
Some of the unreported cases were added to Saturday's figure of 12,872 new cases and Sunday's figure of 22,961.
It said all of the cases "received their Covid-19 test result as normal".
But BBC Health Editor Hugh Pym said it meant the contacts of those who tested positive had not been approached.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54412581
15,841 cases between 25 September and 2 October. That's a lot of missed contacts, for most of whom it's now too late to stop them spreading it. Could be dozens, or even hundreds, of deaths because of it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1140 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(UK) Covid: 16,000 coronavirus cases missed in daily figures after IT error (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2020
OP
Excel: Why using Microsoft's tool caused Covid-19 results to be lost
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2020
#3
The King of Prussia
(745 posts)1. Yeah but
made everyone think for a couple of days that the workshy moron's "Rule of 6" was working.
I look at the case numbers for Bradford. Positive tests have been added on Sunday as far back as late August. On Saturday, the positive test total for 20th September increased by nearly 10%. 25th September is a red herring.
T_i_B
(14,800 posts)2. There's a lot of blame flying around at the moment
Truth be told, I think that people not respecting the rules, weak leadership from Westminster politicians and anti lockdown gobshites like Peter Hitchens and Piers Corbyn all have to take some of the responsibility.
The second wave is happening, and I fully expect full lockdown to return before too long. Winter conditions alone, with people not ventilating their homes as much will play a major part in things here.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,502 posts)3. Excel: Why using Microsoft's tool caused Covid-19 results to be lost
The issue was caused by the way the agency brought together logs produced by commercial firms paid to analyse swab tests of the public, to discover who has the virus.
They filed their results in the form of text-based lists - known as CSV files - without issue.
...
The problem is that PHE's own developers picked an old file format to do this - known as XLS.
As a consequence, each template could handle only about 65,000 rows of data rather than the one million-plus rows that Excel is actually capable of.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54423988
They filed their results in the form of text-based lists - known as CSV files - without issue.
...
The problem is that PHE's own developers picked an old file format to do this - known as XLS.
As a consequence, each template could handle only about 65,000 rows of data rather than the one million-plus rows that Excel is actually capable of.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54423988