Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
Related: About this forum[Tick. Tock. ] Johnson's disregard for rules helped him get elected - but it's starting to wear thin
THIS:
The prime minister is sincere enough about liberty and too inattentive to detail to make a consistent authoritarian. His is a more infantile brand of tyranny that demands control yet is afraid of responsibility. It is a trait that flows not from any doctrine, but from the temperament that sees rules as a personal discomfort and treats duty as an invitation to defiance. Johnson wears the responsibilities of his office much as he wears his clothes: askew for theatrical effect.
That performance is integral to his appeal, but the quality that voters first find attractive in leaders can be a predictor of their undoing. There was a maverick charm in disregarding protocol and cutting legal corners when the purpose was getting Brexit done. The same ethos is more obnoxious when applied in service of Tory donors or indulgence of rule-bending allies.
No violation of constitutional principle could appal the British spirit more than queue jumping. That tendency may not be the most prominent aspect of Johnsons government, but it is a persistent enough feature to breed resentment over time. It is a problem that will outlast the present policy dilemmas of the pandemic. The current challenge is choosing the right rules. But the origin of uncertainty and incoherence, as with corruption, is a prime minister who is himself governed by the principle that rules do not really matter.
That performance is integral to his appeal, but the quality that voters first find attractive in leaders can be a predictor of their undoing. There was a maverick charm in disregarding protocol and cutting legal corners when the purpose was getting Brexit done. The same ethos is more obnoxious when applied in service of Tory donors or indulgence of rule-bending allies.
No violation of constitutional principle could appal the British spirit more than queue jumping. That tendency may not be the most prominent aspect of Johnsons government, but it is a persistent enough feature to breed resentment over time. It is a problem that will outlast the present policy dilemmas of the pandemic. The current challenge is choosing the right rules. But the origin of uncertainty and incoherence, as with corruption, is a prime minister who is himself governed by the principle that rules do not really matter.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/aug/04/johnson-rules-government-covid-policy-regulation]
And THIS:
And THIS (as another example in a litany of examples):
In sworn evidence, Government admitted that some of Lord Bethells dealings with Abingdon had been conducted via WhatsApp or text message, and were held only on his private mobile phone. If that was the case for Abingdon, why not other VIPs too?
Whats more, in December last year, Lord Bethell was told his mobile phone would be searched for documents relating to this case. Just weeks later, it seems, he replaced his phone because, Government lawyers say, it was broken. They are now not sure it will be possible to retrieve the WhatsApp and text messages.
Lord Bethell has overseen the awarding of billions of pounds of public contracts. Information revealing how these contracts came to be awarded may now be lost or even destroyed.
Whats more, in December last year, Lord Bethell was told his mobile phone would be searched for documents relating to this case. Just weeks later, it seems, he replaced his phone because, Government lawyers say, it was broken. They are now not sure it will be possible to retrieve the WhatsApp and text messages.
Lord Bethell has overseen the awarding of billions of pounds of public contracts. Information revealing how these contracts came to be awarded may now be lost or even destroyed.
https://goodlawproject.org/update/lord-bethell-new-phone/
Emphasis mine
MUST EQUAL THIS: (PLEASE)
@coldwarsteve
From Cold War Steve's Photoshop to gods ears..
Wrongdoing sits at the centre of this government. Everything they touch and do is dodgy... The venality and corruption at the heart of this administration is literally criminal. They need to be held accountable. As with the right wing in America their boundless arrogance makes them think they are infallible - sadly they are seemingly not wrong at the moment.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1554 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
[Tick. Tock. ] Johnson's disregard for rules helped him get elected - but it's starting to wear thin (Original Post)
Soph0571
Aug 2021
OP
Ocelot II
(120,953 posts)1. Trump's Mini-Me.
"A more infantile brand of tyranny that demands control yet is afraid of responsibility." The only difference, I think, is that Trump is truly malevolent while BoJo is just a jackass.