CCleaner Malware second payload discovered (9.21.17)
A new report by Cisco's Talos Group suggests that the CCleaner hack was more sophisticated than initially thought. The researchers found evidence of a second payload during their analysis of the malware which targeted very specific groups based on domains.
On September 18, 2017 Piriform reported that the company's infrastructure distributed a malicious version of the file cleaning software CCleaner for about a month.
The company's infrastructure was compromised, and users who downloaded version 5.33 of CCleaner from the website or used automatic updates to install it, got the infected version on their system.
We talked about methods to identify if an infected version is installed on the system. Probably the best indicator, apart from checking CCleaner's version, is to check for the existence of Registry keys under HKLMSOFTWAREPiriformAgomo.
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/09/21/ccleaner-malware-second-payload-discovered/
WhiteTara
(30,150 posts)still running 5.28 Yeah!
Kaleva
(38,064 posts)PDittie
(8,322 posts)I was prompted to download v 5.33 and immediately prompted to do the same for 5.34. I have in fact just downloaded 5.35 this morning, within the past hour.
ThingsGottaChange
(1,200 posts)douglas9
(4,474 posts)At the beginning of this week, reports emerged that Avast, owner of the popular CCleaner software, had been hacked. Initial investigations by security researchers at Cisco Talos discovered that the intruder not only compromised Avast's servers, but managed to embed both a backdoor and "a multi-stage malware payload" that rode on top of the installation of CCleaner. That infected software -- traditionally designed to help scrub PCs of cookies and other tracking software and malware -- was subsequently distributed by Avast to 700,000 customers (initially, that number was thought to be 2.27 million).
And while that's all notably terrible, it appears initial reports dramatically under-stated both the scope and the damage done by the hack. Initially, news reports and statements by Avast insisted that the hackers weren't able to "do any harm" because the second, multi-stage malware payload was never effectively delivered. But subsequent reports by both Avast and Cisco Talos researchers indicate this payload was effectively delivered -- with the express goal of gaining access to the servers and networks of at least 18 technology giants, including Intel, Google, Microsoft, Akamai, Samsung, Sony, VMware, HTC, Linksys, D-Link and Cisco itself.
Cisco's researchers say they obtained a copy of the hackers' command-and-control server from an unnamed source. That server contained detailed logs of the 700,000 or so computers that had "phoned home" to the hackers earlier this month. Subsequent investigation has concluded that the hackers didn't really care about most of the infected customers, and that this may have been a sophisticated state-sponsored attack specifically designed access and copy internal information and trade secrets from major tech firms:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170921/11032238260/ccleaner-hack-may-have-been-state-sponsored-attack-18-major-tech-companies.shtml
Response to douglas9 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed