Barack Obama
Related: About this forumI'm kind wondering ...
Last edited Sun Jan 18, 2015, 11:23 AM - Edit history (1)
why is/are the pundit-class(es) spending so much time talking about President Obama's "legacy", when there is little evidence that President Obama is/has done anything for the purpose of establishing a legacy.
If President Obama were attempting to secure his "legacy" would he now be talking 24/7 about the ACA, Lilly Ledbetter, the end of DADT and DOMA; rather than, pressing immigration reform, tax reform, accessibility to higher education?
I have long sensed (and said) that this President recognizes that (and operates as though) none of this is about him (i.e., a "legacy" ; but, rather, about what is needed.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I started to write "think that way" but there's no real thought involved. They only know how to recite talking points. For them, one of the talking points about a President is "legacy".
Whereas Obama started his adult working life as a community organizer, so he (I'm guessing here) is more inclined to think in terms of immediate effectiveness, then long-term effectiveness of what he does.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the egoism that is society ... because WE are ego-obsessed, others must be, as well.
brer cat
(26,184 posts)I agree that PBO doesn't demonstrate concern for his legacy, and I think that is obvious in the paths he is taking now. He will go out fighting, not simply shoring up past accomplishments.
sheshe2
(87,336 posts)Summed up pretty well here.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025223317
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and very well, I might add.
And sadly, too many "Democrats", can't see it.
sheshe2
(87,336 posts)I just noticed that...
on another thread I just came off. Something to do with what he plans to address at SOTU. That black man can never catch a break here at Democratic Underground, without the old but but but but but!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)about his proposing cuts for the middleclass ... and every other comment is, "Why didn't he do it 4 years ago?"
Perhaps, these posters weren't paying attention to the vote registry for his entire Presidency? Or, maybe, it's that folks don't understand that in politics ... "moral victories" are political losses.
sheshe2
(87,336 posts)That's the one I was referring to, the one when he should have done it when he had that huge "majority" for about 25 days.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)BTW, he has said 'his legacy' never enters into what he does. He says his focus and joy with being POTUS lies within the changes for the better. It's not about him. It's whether life for others get better that is his pleasure.
#2: They are insinuating that he is a phony and as shallow as they are. They are privileged, most of them in their places through nepotism (check the marriages, family lineage and their shared associations) and living in that position seldom leads to original thought. They live in the past.
#1: They've been dreaming about him being out of office before he was in office. They can't bear to think for one second of 'that man' in the White House.
The more ominous part comes from the fact that a person's legacy is not usually discussed until they are dead. Which really puts the icing on the cake of #1. It's a Death Wish.
JMNSHO.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But will add, as you touched on, when we talk about "legacy" we are closing the conservation to anything that is to come ... we focus on, and re-litigate, what was done.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)everyone, including liberals, project(s) their own narcissism/egoism.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Don't you just love it? And wow, what an elegant smackdown with the SOTU.
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Cha
(305,220 posts)the world.