Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:13 AM Feb 2015

Three Minutes to Midnight: Can We Turn the Clock Back in Time?

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/28951-three-minutes-to-midnight-can-we-turn-the-clock-back-in-time



With atomic scientists' "Doomsday Clock" two minutes closer to midnight and a report from the National Climatic Data Center confirming that 2014 was the hottest year on record, Congress is trying to move us closer to ecocide. Reversing course will require urgent, concerted action.

Three Minutes to Midnight: Can We Turn the Clock Back in Time?
Sunday, 08 February 2015 00:00 By Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi, Truthout | Op-Ed

On January 22, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists announced that it had moved the minutes hand of its "Doomsday Clock" ahead two minutes, from five minutes before midnight to three minutes before midnight. The clock envisions the life span of human civilization as a period of 24 hours. Thus when scientists decide to move the minutes hand ahead by two minutes, this means that they consider us to be drawing closer to the end of our time. With only three minutes left, we don't have much leeway.

The analogy, however, is not perfect, for there's an important difference between a real clock and the Doomsday Clock. A real clock, as long as its batteries are working, will always move forward, from second to second and minute to minute. The Doomsday Clock, in contrast, does not have to move forward, for apart from its astrophysical constraints, human civilization is not rolling along a one-way track toward some predestined end where everything comes to a stop. The minute hand on the clock of civilization could well stand still, or indeed even move in reverse, from the danger zone back toward safety. We can, perhaps, delay our final dénouement and flourish - even for many more centuries.

The hand has not moved forward because a giant meteor is about to crash into Central Europe, or because a ring of volcanoes is due to erupt from France to Siberia, or because alien invaders from a distant galaxy are about to land in the American Corn Belt. No, the hand of the clock has moved forward, from five minutes to three minutes before midnight, because of human activity itself. It has moved forward because of bad choices, programs and policies imposed by those at the wheels of power.

The Bulletin cited in particular two factors as the basis for its decision to advance the minute hand of its Doomsday Clock. One is the unchecked increase in climate change, the other the modernization of nuclear weapons systems. Both are clearly reflective of misguided choices, and the scientists spared no punches in laying the blame where it deserved to fall: on world leaders who failed to act "with the speed or on the scale required to protect citizens from potential catastrophe." Some scientists pointed to the role that nuclear weapons have played in heightening the danger; others stressed the failure to stem climate change. One board member, Richard Somerville, emphasized that "efforts at reducing global emissions of heat-trapping gases have so far been entirely insufficient to prevent unacceptable climate disruption . . . The resulting climate change will harm millions of people and will threaten many key ecological systems on which civilization relies."
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Three Minutes to Midnight: Can We Turn the Clock Back in Time? (Original Post) unhappycamper Feb 2015 OP
No, we probably cannot. In case no one's noticed, the crazies have taken Nay Feb 2015 #1

Nay

(12,051 posts)
1. No, we probably cannot. In case no one's noticed, the crazies have taken
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:57 AM
Feb 2015

over the asylum, so rational discussion and measured decision-making to SAVE THE VERY PLANET WE DEPEND ON will not happen, not without some sort of soul-shaking disaster that wakes everyone, and I mean everyone, up. That's not going to happen. We're going to die like the slowly boiled frogs in the pot because humans, like every organism that must grow up on a planet where competition for food, sex, and other necessities is the defining force, can only cooperate in small groups. Other groups are "the other" and are not to be attended to at all -- they should just go somewhere and die.

We may, as a species, die back to a bottleneck of a few million or so, and the cycle of becoming civilized again may possibly go forward. But that's the most we can expect.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»Three Minutes to Midnight...