NICK STOCKTON SCIENCE 09.15.16.
House Republicans Are Trying to Blackball the Climate Investigation into Exxon
ONCE UPON A time, climate science and politics were separate things. Then came several decades of scientific denial, distortion, and gaslighting. One of the companies responsible for politicizing climate change is ExxonMobil, which for years funded climate change denial groups despite its own research confirming that greenhouse gases cause global warming. Now, the battle to hold them accountable has become a proxy war between a lead denier in the US House of Representatives and groups that are working to make Exxon legally responsible for its actions.
Some of this is political theater. Yesterday, Texas Republican Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Science Committee, heard arguments from a panel of expertstwo of whom work for Exxon-funded think tankson why his committee has the authority to intervene in the investigations into Exxons denialism. But if this is theater, it is not over once the curtain closes. Displays like this further confuse the public about how science is done. And it drags out the spurious narrative that science isnt in consensus about climate change, its causes, and effects. That affects everyone living on this warming planet.
First: a little background. Last year, Inside Climate News published
a massive exposé detailing how Exxon had suppressed its own scienceamong the first to confirm that greenhouse gas emissions would lead to climate changein order to promote an anticlimate agenda. This prompted many state attorneys general to open investigations as to whether Exxons knowing denial of climate science defrauded its investors.
These were blue state AGsNew York, Massachusetts, California, Hawaiiand climate-focused NGOs. Smith smelled a rat. The coordinated attack looked to him like politically-motivated attempt to suppress Exxons first amendment right to express a scientific opinion that differs from the mainstream. (Sidebar: Thats not how science works.) So back in May, he subpoenaed communications between attorneys general from New York and Massachusetts, and eight climate-focused NGOs. The state AGs and NGOs refused to comply with the subpoena, because they didnt believe the request was within Smiths jurisdiction.
Which brings us to today. Smith cant make them turn over their communications, because he doesnt have enough backing to give his subpoena legal weight. He needs this bugaboo to move from his committee to the entire House of Representatives, where they will, he hopes, vote that the AGs and NGOs are acting in contempt of Congress. ...
[font size=1]
-snip-[/font]