Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 07:42 AM Jan 2014

White House supports Senator Rand Paul’s bill to officially end U.S. Iraq war authority

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/14/white-house-supports-senator-rand-pauls-bill-to-officially-end-u-s-iraq-war-authority/



Even a stopped clock is correct twice a day - unhappycamper

White House supports Senator Rand Paul’s bill to officially end U.S. Iraq war authority
By Agence France-Presse
Tuesday, January 14, 2014 13:32 EST

Senator Rand Paul will introduce legislation Tuesday to finally bring Washington’s Iraq war authorization to an end, his office said, and the White House backs the Republican’s efforts in principle.

US forces withdrew from Iraq more than two years ago and President Barack Obama declared the war over, yet a loophole in the law green-lighting the March 2003 invasion of Iraq allows for future US presidents to send troops back to the turbulent country.

The bill by Paul, a libertarian who has consistently sought to scale back foreign intervention by US forces, would repeal the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) in Iraq.

“The war in Iraq is officially over,” Paul said, according to Foreign Policy magazine.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House supports Senator Rand Paul’s bill to officially end U.S. Iraq war authority (Original Post) unhappycamper Jan 2014 OP
If Obama supports it, then doesn't that mean Paul must oppose it rurallib Jan 2014 #1

rurallib

(63,213 posts)
1. If Obama supports it, then doesn't that mean Paul must oppose it
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 08:29 AM
Jan 2014

just by definition? That no republican can ever vote for something Obama favors?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»White House supports Sena...