Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:13 PM Mar 2012

A question about Dennis not endorsing Kaptur.

This was on a big forum with a video, and the feeling by some was DK showed bad sportsmanship or party disloyalty by not endorsing Kaptur in the general election against 'Joe the Plumber.'

He mentioned that there had been some dirty politics involved; and that he did take his former district by a vast majority. Last year, he saw the writing on the wall, and it wasn't the first time his seat had been threatened or he'd lost an election.

The conversation went back and forth and I joined in. The thread got long. But soon after that thread, I had a question to ask of those accusing Dennis:

Is it possible his not endorsing Kaptur was in order to help her?

After all, the same district has enough support for Palin supporter's Joe. And the people who voted against Dennis in the newer parts of his district, may have been making a resounding statement about his beliefs and policies.

If he endorses Kaptur, might not the GOP candidate tar her with the slurs that they used on Dennis and not vote for her?

I ask this because although DK has had to be a scrapper, I don't believe that the video proved he is not endorsing her out of spite or sour grapes, so to speak.

In that thread I mentioned that when I met DK and watched the floor questions, it was clear he also supports Obama, despite not being able to change his positions on some things that DK people see as essentials. So he sees the big picture and that may be why he didn't endorse her on television.

And I'd love to see DK in Congress in Washington state. Let's see how that works out. In the meantime, he will do what he can until his term is up.



9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
2. What upsets me is that the GOP gerrymandered and forced them to compete for a seat.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:26 PM
Mar 2012

Is anybody in OH worried about *that*?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. It's what happens when D voters stay home in years divisible by 10.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:42 PM
Mar 2012

As far as gerrymandering, it's not that badly drawn of a district. Ohio lost a district, so somewhere two incumbents would be running against each other. And since D's stayed home, R's got to draw the lines.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
5. You mean connecting the Kucinich residence to Toledo by a thin strip of beach
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 05:30 PM
Mar 2012

--which is underwater at high tide is acceptable? Puleeze Louise!

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
3. Kaptur's already known as a liberal and it's a blue district
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:40 PM
Mar 2012

So an endorsement or lack thereof isn't going to help or hurt Kaptur - Kucinich voters should have a very easy time pulling the level for Kaptur based on her record, and the few conservative voters in that district aren't going to pull the lever for her whether or not Kucinich endorsed her.

Joe is set up to lose badly to Kaptur, which is why the R's are running him. Might as well toss aside a useless weight and maybe he'll finally fade away.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
8. It's not really a dirty trick
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:17 AM
Mar 2012

There's redistricting after every census. It's not really a dirty trick when it happens every decade.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Dennis Kucinich»A question about Dennis n...