Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

Jitter65

(3,089 posts) Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:54 AM Jun 2016

People need to understand that the Reagan growth rate of 4% happened under a nation

with about 20 million people less. You just can't create jobs in an environment of high tech and automation, will the growth of population that we have now. Someone needs to do some explaining to the voters. The only answer is infrastructure jobs but that takes investment from Wall Street and other folks we don't like. But Hillary may have more influence with them than Bernie or Trump.

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

People need to understand that the Reagan growth rate of 4% happened under a nation (Original Post) Jitter65 Jun 2016 OP

The 90's had stronger growth and it wasn't on a credit card. BootinUp Jun 2016 #1

BootinUp

(49,041 posts)

1. The 90's had stronger growth and it wasn't on a credit card.

Reply to Jitter65 (Original post)

Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:18 AM

Jun 2016

Reagonomics, trickle down, supply side, whatever you want to call it, it's a sham. And it has a HUGE amount to do, with the increasing inequality in the US.

Reply to this discussion